Commit 3a225670 authored by Zheng Liu's avatar Zheng Liu Committed by Theodore Ts'o

ext4: fix the wrong number of the allocated blocks in ext4_split_extent()

This commit fixes a wrong return value of the number of the allocated
blocks in ext4_split_extent.  When the length of blocks we want to
allocate is greater than the length of the current extent, we return a
wrong number.  Let's see what happens in the following case when we
call ext4_split_extent().

  map: [48, 72]
  ex:  [32, 64, u]

'ex' will be split into two parts:
  ex1: [32, 47, u]
  ex2: [48, 64, w]

'map->m_len' is returned from this function, and the value is 24.  But
the real length is 16.  So it should be fixed.

Meanwhile in this commit we use right length of the allocated blocks
when get_reserved_cluster_alloc in ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents
is called.
Signed-off-by: default avatarZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
parent adb23551
......@@ -3067,6 +3067,7 @@ static int ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
int err = 0;
int uninitialized;
int split_flag1, flags1;
int allocated = map->m_len;
depth = ext_depth(inode);
ex = path[depth].p_ext;
......@@ -3086,6 +3087,8 @@ static int ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
map->m_lblk + map->m_len, split_flag1, flags1);
if (err)
goto out;
} else {
allocated = ee_len - (map->m_lblk - ee_block);
}
/*
* Update path is required because previous ext4_split_extent_at() may
......@@ -3115,7 +3118,7 @@ static int ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
ext4_ext_show_leaf(inode, path);
out:
return err ? err : map->m_len;
return err ? err : allocated;
}
/*
......@@ -3730,6 +3733,7 @@ ext4_ext_handle_uninitialized_extents(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
allocated - map->m_len);
allocated = map->m_len;
}
map->m_len = allocated;
/*
* If we have done fallocate with the offset that is already
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment