Commit 3b73af6c authored by Manish Mandlik's avatar Manish Mandlik Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

Bluetooth: Fix refcount use-after-free issue

[ Upstream commit 6c08fc89 ]

There is no lock preventing both l2cap_sock_release() and
chan->ops->close() from running at the same time.

If we consider Thread A running l2cap_chan_timeout() and Thread B running
l2cap_sock_release(), expected behavior is:
  A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_chan_close()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()
  A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill()
  B::l2cap_sock_release()->sock_orphan()
  B::l2cap_sock_release()->l2cap_sock_kill()

where,
sock_orphan() clears "sk->sk_socket" and l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() marks
socket as SOCK_ZAPPED.

In l2cap_sock_kill(), there is an "if-statement" that checks if both
sock_orphan() and sock_teardown() has been run i.e. sk->sk_socket is NULL
and socket is marked as SOCK_ZAPPED. Socket is killed if the condition is
satisfied.

In the race condition, following occurs:
  A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_chan_close()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()
  B::l2cap_sock_release()->sock_orphan()
  B::l2cap_sock_release()->l2cap_sock_kill()
  A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill()

In this scenario, "if-statement" is true in both B::l2cap_sock_kill() and
A::l2cap_sock_kill() and we hit "refcount: underflow; use-after-free" bug.

Similar condition occurs at other places where teardown/sock_kill is
happening:
  l2cap_disconnect_rsp()->l2cap_chan_del()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()
  l2cap_disconnect_rsp()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill()

  l2cap_conn_del()->l2cap_chan_del()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()
  l2cap_conn_del()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill()

  l2cap_disconnect_req()->l2cap_chan_del()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()
  l2cap_disconnect_req()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill()

  l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen()->l2cap_chan_close()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()
  l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen()->l2cap_sock_kill()

Protect teardown/sock_kill and orphan/sock_kill by adding hold_lock on
l2cap channel to ensure that the socket is killed only after marked as
zapped and orphan.
Signed-off-by: default avatarManish Mandlik <mmandlik@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent fd095623
......@@ -414,6 +414,9 @@ static void l2cap_chan_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
BT_DBG("chan %p state %s", chan, state_to_string(chan->state));
mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock);
/* __set_chan_timer() calls l2cap_chan_hold(chan) while scheduling
* this work. No need to call l2cap_chan_hold(chan) here again.
*/
l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
if (chan->state == BT_CONNECTED || chan->state == BT_CONFIG)
......@@ -426,12 +429,12 @@ static void l2cap_chan_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
l2cap_chan_close(chan, reason);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
chan->ops->close(chan);
mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
l2cap_chan_put(chan);
mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
}
struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_chan_create(void)
......@@ -1725,9 +1728,9 @@ static void l2cap_conn_del(struct hci_conn *hcon, int err)
l2cap_chan_del(chan, err);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
chan->ops->close(chan);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
l2cap_chan_put(chan);
}
......@@ -4337,6 +4340,7 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
return 0;
}
l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
rsp.dcid = cpu_to_le16(chan->scid);
......@@ -4345,12 +4349,11 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
chan->ops->set_shutdown(chan);
l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
l2cap_chan_del(chan, ECONNRESET);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
chan->ops->close(chan);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
l2cap_chan_put(chan);
mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
......@@ -4382,20 +4385,21 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
return 0;
}
l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
if (chan->state != BT_DISCONN) {
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
l2cap_chan_put(chan);
mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
return 0;
}
l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
l2cap_chan_del(chan, 0);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
chan->ops->close(chan);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
l2cap_chan_put(chan);
mutex_unlock(&conn->chan_lock);
......
......@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ static int l2cap_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
}
/* Kill socket (only if zapped and orphan)
* Must be called on unlocked socket.
* Must be called on unlocked socket, with l2cap channel lock.
*/
static void l2cap_sock_kill(struct sock *sk)
{
......@@ -1200,8 +1200,15 @@ static int l2cap_sock_release(struct socket *sock)
err = l2cap_sock_shutdown(sock, 2);
l2cap_chan_hold(l2cap_pi(sk)->chan);
l2cap_chan_lock(l2cap_pi(sk)->chan);
sock_orphan(sk);
l2cap_sock_kill(sk);
l2cap_chan_unlock(l2cap_pi(sk)->chan);
l2cap_chan_put(l2cap_pi(sk)->chan);
return err;
}
......@@ -1219,12 +1226,15 @@ static void l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen(struct sock *parent)
BT_DBG("child chan %p state %s", chan,
state_to_string(chan->state));
l2cap_chan_hold(chan);
l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
__clear_chan_timer(chan);
l2cap_chan_close(chan, ECONNRESET);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
l2cap_sock_kill(sk);
l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
l2cap_chan_put(chan);
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment