Commit 3f874b66 authored by Mark Brown's avatar Mark Brown Committed by Samuel Ortiz

mfd: Fix section mismatch in da903x

The subdevice removal functions are marked __devexit but are referenced
from the error handling path when probing so are needed even when
__devexit functions are removed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Acked-by: default avatarEric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSamuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
parent 88e75cc3
...@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id da903x_id_table[] = { ...@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id da903x_id_table[] = {
}; };
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, da903x_id_table); MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, da903x_id_table);
static int __devexit __remove_subdev(struct device *dev, void *unused) static int __remove_subdev(struct device *dev, void *unused)
{ {
platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(dev)); platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(dev));
return 0; return 0;
} }
static int __devexit da903x_remove_subdevs(struct da903x_chip *chip) static int da903x_remove_subdevs(struct da903x_chip *chip)
{ {
return device_for_each_child(chip->dev, NULL, __remove_subdev); return device_for_each_child(chip->dev, NULL, __remove_subdev);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment