Commit 43295d73 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/wakeup: Split out the wakeup ->__state check

RT kernels have a slightly more complicated handling of wakeups due to
'sleeping' spin/rwlocks. If a task is blocked on such a lock then the
original state of the task is preserved over the blocking period, and
any regular (non lock related) wakeup has to be targeted at the
saved state to ensure that these wakeups are not lost.

Once the task acquires the lock it restores the task state from the saved state.

To avoid cluttering try_to_wake_up() with that logic, split the wakeup
state check out into an inline helper and use it at both places where
task::__state is checked against the state argument of try_to_wake_up().

No functional change.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210815211302.088945085@linutronix.de
parent b41cda03
......@@ -3561,6 +3561,22 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
}
/*
* Invoked from try_to_wake_up() to check whether the task can be woken up.
*
* The caller holds p::pi_lock if p != current or has preemption
* disabled when p == current.
*/
static __always_inline
bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success)
{
if (READ_ONCE(p->__state) & state) {
*success = 1;
return true;
}
return false;
}
/*
* Notes on Program-Order guarantees on SMP systems.
*
......@@ -3700,10 +3716,9 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
* - we're serialized against set_special_state() by virtue of
* it disabling IRQs (this allows not taking ->pi_lock).
*/
if (!(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & state))
if (!ttwu_state_match(p, state, &success))
goto out;
success = 1;
trace_sched_waking(p);
WRITE_ONCE(p->__state, TASK_RUNNING);
trace_sched_wakeup(p);
......@@ -3718,14 +3733,11 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
smp_mb__after_spinlock();
if (!(READ_ONCE(p->__state) & state))
if (!ttwu_state_match(p, state, &success))
goto unlock;
trace_sched_waking(p);
/* We're going to change ->state: */
success = 1;
/*
* Ensure we load p->on_rq _after_ p->state, otherwise it would
* be possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0 and get stuck
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment