Commit 44757092 authored by Frederic Weisbecker's avatar Frederic Weisbecker Committed by Paul E. McKenney

rcu-tasks: Remove preemption disablement around srcu_read_[un]lock() calls

Ever since the following commit:

	5a41344a ("srcu: Simplify __srcu_read_unlock() via this_cpu_dec()")

SRCU doesn't rely anymore on preemption to be disabled in order to
modify the per-CPU counter. And even then it used to be done from the API
itself.

Therefore and after checking further, it appears to be safe to remove
the preemption disablement around __srcu_read_[un]lock() in
exit_tasks_rcu_start() and exit_tasks_rcu_finish()
Suggested-by: default avatarBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: default avatarNeeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
parent e4e1e808
......@@ -1008,9 +1008,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread);
*/
void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
{
preempt_disable();
current->rcu_tasks_idx = __srcu_read_lock(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu);
preempt_enable();
}
/*
......@@ -1022,9 +1020,7 @@ void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
{
struct task_struct *t = current;
preempt_disable();
__srcu_read_unlock(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu, t->rcu_tasks_idx);
preempt_enable();
exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(t);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment