xen-netback: Fix releasing header slot on error path

[ Upstream commit 1b860da0 ]

This patch makes this function aware that the first frag and the header might
share the same ring slot. That could happen if the first slot is bigger than
PKT_PROT_LEN. Due to this the error path might release that slot twice or never,
depending on the error scenario.
xenvif_idx_release is also removed from xenvif_idx_unmap, and called separately.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Reported-by: Armin Zentai <armin.zentai@ezit.hu>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c

@@ -1016,6 +1016,8 @@ static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif *vif,
 	 */
 	struct skb_shared_info *first_shinfo = NULL;
 	int nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags;
+	const bool sharedslot = nr_frags &&
+				frag_get_pending_idx(&shinfo->frags[0]) == pending_idx;
 	int i, err;
 
 	/* Check status of header. */
@@ -1028,7 +1030,10 @@ static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif *vif,
 				   (*gopp_copy)->status,
 				   pending_idx,
 				   (*gopp_copy)->source.u.ref);
-		xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx, XEN_NETIF_RSP_ERROR);
+		/* The first frag might still have this slot mapped */
+		if (!sharedslot)
+			xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx,
+					   XEN_NETIF_RSP_ERROR);
 	}
 
 check_frags:
@@ -1045,8 +1050,19 @@ static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif *vif,
 						pending_idx,
 						gop_map->handle);
 			/* Had a previous error? Invalidate this fragment. */
-			if (unlikely(err))
+			if (unlikely(err)) {
 				xenvif_idx_unmap(vif, pending_idx);
+				/* If the mapping of the first frag was OK, but
+				 * the header's copy failed, and they are
+				 * sharing a slot, send an error
+				 */
+				if (i == 0 && sharedslot)
+					xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx,
+							   XEN_NETIF_RSP_ERROR);
+				else
+					xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx,
+							   XEN_NETIF_RSP_OKAY);
+			}
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1058,15 +1074,27 @@ static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif *vif,
 				   gop_map->status,
 				   pending_idx,
 				   gop_map->ref);
+
 		xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx, XEN_NETIF_RSP_ERROR);
 
 		/* Not the first error? Preceding frags already invalidated. */
 		if (err)
 			continue;
-		/* First error: invalidate preceding fragments. */
+
+		/* First error: if the header haven't shared a slot with the
+		 * first frag, release it as well.
+		 */
+		if (!sharedslot)
+			xenvif_idx_release(vif,
+					   XENVIF_TX_CB(skb)->pending_idx,
+					   XEN_NETIF_RSP_OKAY);
+
+		/* Invalidate preceding fragments of this skb. */
 		for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
 			pending_idx = frag_get_pending_idx(&shinfo->frags[j]);
 			xenvif_idx_unmap(vif, pending_idx);
+			xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx,
+					   XEN_NETIF_RSP_OKAY);
 		}
 
 		/* And if we found the error while checking the frag_list, unmap
@@ -1076,6 +1104,8 @@ static int xenvif_tx_check_gop(struct xenvif *vif,
 			for (j = 0; j < first_shinfo->nr_frags; j++) {
 				pending_idx = frag_get_pending_idx(&first_shinfo->frags[j]);
 				xenvif_idx_unmap(vif, pending_idx);
+				xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx,
+						   XEN_NETIF_RSP_OKAY);
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -1811,8 +1841,6 @@ void xenvif_idx_unmap(struct xenvif *vif, u16 pending_idx)
 			   tx_unmap_op.status);
 		BUG();
 	}
-
-	xenvif_idx_release(vif, pending_idx, XEN_NETIF_RSP_OKAY);
 }
 
 static inline int rx_work_todo(struct xenvif *vif)