wlcore: clean-up clearing of WL1271_FLAG_IRQ_RUNNING

We set WL1271_FLAG_IRQ_RUNNING in the beginning of wlcore_irq(), but clear
it before interrupt handling is done in wlcore_irq_locked().

Let's move the clearing to the end of wlcore_irq() where it gets set,
and remove the old comments about hardirq. That's no longer the case as
we're using request_threaded_irq().

Note that the WL1271_FLAG_IRQ_RUNNING should never race between the
interrupt handler and wlcore_runtime_resume() as because of autosuspend
timeout we cannot enter idle between wlcore_irq_locked() and the end of
wlcore_irq().

Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc: Eyal Reizer <eyalr@ti.com>
Cc: Guy Mishol <guym@ti.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c

@@ -544,11 +544,6 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 	}
 
 	while (!done && loopcount--) {
-		/*
-		 * In order to avoid a race with the hardirq, clear the flag
-		 * before acknowledging the chip.
-		 */
-		clear_bit(WL1271_FLAG_IRQ_RUNNING, &wl->flags);
 		smp_mb__after_atomic();
 
 		ret = wlcore_fw_status(wl, wl->fw_status);
@@ -668,7 +663,7 @@ static irqreturn_t wlcore_irq(int irq, void *cookie)
 		disable_irq_nosync(wl->irq);
 		pm_wakeup_event(wl->dev, 0);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
+		goto out_handled;
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
 
@@ -692,6 +687,11 @@ static irqreturn_t wlcore_irq(int irq, void *cookie)
 
 	mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
 
+out_handled:
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
+	clear_bit(WL1271_FLAG_IRQ_RUNNING, &wl->flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
+
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }