Commit 492cf132 authored by Steffen Maier's avatar Steffen Maier Committed by Luis Henriques

zfcp: trace on request for open and close of WKA port

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637510

commit d27a7cb9 upstream.

Since commit a54ca0f6
("[SCSI] zfcp: Redesign of the debug tracing for HBA records.")
HBA records no longer contain WWPN, D_ID, or LUN
to reduce duplicate information which is already in REC records.
In contrast to "regular" target ports, we don't use recovery to open
WKA ports such as directory/nameserver, so we don't get REC records.
Therefore, introduce pseudo REC running records without any
actual recovery action but including D_ID of WKA port on open/close.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Maier <maier@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: a54ca0f6 ("[SCSI] zfcp: Redesign of the debug tracing for HBA records.")
Reviewed-by: default avatarBenjamin Block <bblock@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
parent 34f120b1
......@@ -321,6 +321,38 @@ void zfcp_dbf_rec_run(char *tag, struct zfcp_erp_action *erp)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dbf->rec_lock, flags);
}
/**
* zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka - trace wka port event with info like running recovery
* @tag: identifier for event
* @wka_port: well known address port
* @req_id: request ID to correlate with potential HBA trace record
*/
void zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka(char *tag, struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port,
u64 req_id)
{
struct zfcp_dbf *dbf = wka_port->adapter->dbf;
struct zfcp_dbf_rec *rec = &dbf->rec_buf;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&dbf->rec_lock, flags);
memset(rec, 0, sizeof(*rec));
rec->id = ZFCP_DBF_REC_RUN;
memcpy(rec->tag, tag, ZFCP_DBF_TAG_LEN);
rec->port_status = wka_port->status;
rec->d_id = wka_port->d_id;
rec->lun = ZFCP_DBF_INVALID_LUN;
rec->u.run.fsf_req_id = req_id;
rec->u.run.rec_status = ~0;
rec->u.run.rec_step = ~0;
rec->u.run.rec_action = ~0;
rec->u.run.rec_count = ~0;
debug_event(dbf->rec, 1, rec, sizeof(*rec));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dbf->rec_lock, flags);
}
static inline
void zfcp_dbf_san(char *tag, struct zfcp_dbf *dbf, void *data, u8 id, u16 len,
u64 req_id, u32 d_id)
......
......@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ extern void zfcp_dbf_adapter_unregister(struct zfcp_adapter *);
extern void zfcp_dbf_rec_trig(char *, struct zfcp_adapter *,
struct zfcp_port *, struct scsi_device *, u8, u8);
extern void zfcp_dbf_rec_run(char *, struct zfcp_erp_action *);
extern void zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka(char *, struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *, u64);
extern void zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_uss(char *, struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
extern void zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_res(char *, int, struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
extern void zfcp_dbf_hba_bit_err(char *, struct zfcp_fsf_req *);
......
......@@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
int zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port)
{
struct zfcp_qdio *qdio = wka_port->adapter->qdio;
struct zfcp_fsf_req *req;
struct zfcp_fsf_req *req = NULL;
int retval = -EIO;
spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
......@@ -1610,6 +1610,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_open_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port)
zfcp_fsf_req_free(req);
out:
spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
if (req && !IS_ERR(req))
zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fsowp_1", wka_port, req->req_id);
return retval;
}
......@@ -1634,7 +1636,7 @@ static void zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req)
int zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port)
{
struct zfcp_qdio *qdio = wka_port->adapter->qdio;
struct zfcp_fsf_req *req;
struct zfcp_fsf_req *req = NULL;
int retval = -EIO;
spin_lock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
......@@ -1663,6 +1665,8 @@ int zfcp_fsf_close_wka_port(struct zfcp_fc_wka_port *wka_port)
zfcp_fsf_req_free(req);
out:
spin_unlock_irq(&qdio->req_q_lock);
if (req && !IS_ERR(req))
zfcp_dbf_rec_run_wka("fscwp_1", wka_port, req->req_id);
return retval;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment