Commit 4ae8d3a5 authored by Dmitry Fomichev's avatar Dmitry Fomichev Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

dm zoned: support zone sizes smaller than 128MiB

commit b3996295 upstream.

dm-zoned is observed to log failed kernel assertions and not work
correctly when operating against a device with a zone size smaller
than 128MiB (e.g. 32768 bits per 4K block). The reason is that the
bitmap size per zone is calculated as zero with such a small zone
size. Fix this problem and also make the code related to zone bitmap
management be able to handle per zone bitmaps smaller than a single
block.

A dm-zoned-tools patch is required to properly format dm-zoned devices
with zone sizes smaller than 128MiB.

Fixes: 3b1a94c8 ("dm zoned: drive-managed zoned block device target")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDamien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 8a7c008c
......@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ struct dmz_metadata {
sector_t zone_bitmap_size;
unsigned int zone_nr_bitmap_blocks;
unsigned int zone_bits_per_mblk;
unsigned int nr_bitmap_blocks;
unsigned int nr_map_blocks;
......@@ -1165,7 +1166,10 @@ static int dmz_init_zones(struct dmz_metadata *zmd)
/* Init */
zmd->zone_bitmap_size = dev->zone_nr_blocks >> 3;
zmd->zone_nr_bitmap_blocks = zmd->zone_bitmap_size >> DMZ_BLOCK_SHIFT;
zmd->zone_nr_bitmap_blocks =
max_t(sector_t, 1, zmd->zone_bitmap_size >> DMZ_BLOCK_SHIFT);
zmd->zone_bits_per_mblk = min_t(sector_t, dev->zone_nr_blocks,
DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS);
/* Allocate zone array */
zmd->zones = kcalloc(dev->nr_zones, sizeof(struct dm_zone), GFP_KERNEL);
......@@ -1982,7 +1986,7 @@ int dmz_copy_valid_blocks(struct dmz_metadata *zmd, struct dm_zone *from_zone,
dmz_release_mblock(zmd, to_mblk);
dmz_release_mblock(zmd, from_mblk);
chunk_block += DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS;
chunk_block += zmd->zone_bits_per_mblk;
}
to_zone->weight = from_zone->weight;
......@@ -2043,7 +2047,7 @@ int dmz_validate_blocks(struct dmz_metadata *zmd, struct dm_zone *zone,
/* Set bits */
bit = chunk_block & DMZ_BLOCK_MASK_BITS;
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS - bit);
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, zmd->zone_bits_per_mblk - bit);
count = dmz_set_bits((unsigned long *)mblk->data, bit, nr_bits);
if (count) {
......@@ -2122,7 +2126,7 @@ int dmz_invalidate_blocks(struct dmz_metadata *zmd, struct dm_zone *zone,
/* Clear bits */
bit = chunk_block & DMZ_BLOCK_MASK_BITS;
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS - bit);
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, zmd->zone_bits_per_mblk - bit);
count = dmz_clear_bits((unsigned long *)mblk->data,
bit, nr_bits);
......@@ -2182,6 +2186,7 @@ static int dmz_to_next_set_block(struct dmz_metadata *zmd, struct dm_zone *zone,
{
struct dmz_mblock *mblk;
unsigned int bit, set_bit, nr_bits;
unsigned int zone_bits = zmd->zone_bits_per_mblk;
unsigned long *bitmap;
int n = 0;
......@@ -2196,15 +2201,15 @@ static int dmz_to_next_set_block(struct dmz_metadata *zmd, struct dm_zone *zone,
/* Get offset */
bitmap = (unsigned long *) mblk->data;
bit = chunk_block & DMZ_BLOCK_MASK_BITS;
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS - bit);
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, zone_bits - bit);
if (set)
set_bit = find_next_bit(bitmap, DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS, bit);
set_bit = find_next_bit(bitmap, zone_bits, bit);
else
set_bit = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS, bit);
set_bit = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, zone_bits, bit);
dmz_release_mblock(zmd, mblk);
n += set_bit - bit;
if (set_bit < DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS)
if (set_bit < zone_bits)
break;
nr_blocks -= nr_bits;
......@@ -2307,7 +2312,7 @@ static void dmz_get_zone_weight(struct dmz_metadata *zmd, struct dm_zone *zone)
/* Count bits in this block */
bitmap = mblk->data;
bit = chunk_block & DMZ_BLOCK_MASK_BITS;
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, DMZ_BLOCK_SIZE_BITS - bit);
nr_bits = min(nr_blocks, zmd->zone_bits_per_mblk - bit);
n += dmz_count_bits(bitmap, bit, nr_bits);
dmz_release_mblock(zmd, mblk);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment