Commit 4c46e34e authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915/fbc: s/intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen()/intel_fbc_surface_size_ok()/

Rename intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen() to intel_fbc_surface_size_ok()
so that the naming scheme is the same for the surface size vs. plane
size checks. "surface size" is what bspec talks about.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240705145254.3355-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
parent da9bbdb9
......@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static void intel_fbc_max_surface_size(struct intel_display *display,
* the X and Y offset registers. That's why we include the src x/y offsets
* instead of just looking at the plane size.
*/
static bool intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
static bool intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
{
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
unsigned int effective_w, effective_h, max_w, max_h;
......@@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
return 0;
}
if (!intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(plane_state)) {
if (!intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(plane_state)) {
plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "surface size too big";
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment