Commit 4dd60290 authored by Milton Miller's avatar Milton Miller Committed by Benjamin Herrenschmidt

powerpc: Fix irq_free_virt by adjusting bounds before loop

Instead of looping over each irq and checking against the irq array
bounds, adjust the bounds before looping.

The old code will not free any irq if the irq + count is above
irq_virq_count because the test in the loop is testing irq + count
instead of irq + i.

This code checks the limits to avoid unsigned integer overflows.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMilton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
parent 9b788251
......@@ -1007,14 +1007,23 @@ void irq_free_virt(unsigned int virq, unsigned int count)
WARN_ON (virq < NUM_ISA_INTERRUPTS);
WARN_ON (count == 0 || (virq + count) > irq_virq_count);
if (virq < NUM_ISA_INTERRUPTS) {
if (virq + count < NUM_ISA_INTERRUPTS)
return;
count =- NUM_ISA_INTERRUPTS - virq;
virq = NUM_ISA_INTERRUPTS;
}
if (count > irq_virq_count || virq > irq_virq_count - count) {
if (virq > irq_virq_count)
return;
count = irq_virq_count - virq;
}
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_big_lock, flags);
for (i = virq; i < (virq + count); i++) {
struct irq_host *host;
if (i < NUM_ISA_INTERRUPTS ||
(virq + count) > irq_virq_count)
continue;
host = irq_map[i].host;
irq_map[i].hwirq = host->inval_irq;
smp_wmb();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment