Commit 4ed91fa9 authored by Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)'s avatar Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) Committed by Andrew Morton

mm: vmalloc: bail out early in find_vmap_area() if vmap is not init

During the boot the s390 system triggers "spinlock bad magic" messages
if the spinlock debugging is enabled:

[    0.465445] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, swapper/0
[    0.465490]  lock: single+0x1860/0x1958, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
[    0.466067] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.8.0-12955-g8e938e39 #1
[    0.466188] Hardware name: QEMU 8561 QEMU (KVM/Linux)
[    0.466270] Call Trace:
[    0.466470]  [<00000000011f26c8>] dump_stack_lvl+0x98/0xd8
[    0.466516]  [<00000000001dcc6a>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8a/0x108
[    0.466545]  [<000000000042146c>] find_vmap_area+0x6c/0x108
[    0.466572]  [<000000000042175a>] find_vm_area+0x22/0x40
[    0.466597]  [<000000000012f152>] __set_memory+0x132/0x150
[    0.466624]  [<0000000001cc0398>] vmem_map_init+0x40/0x118
[    0.466651]  [<0000000001cc0092>] paging_init+0x22/0x68
[    0.466677]  [<0000000001cbbed2>] setup_arch+0x52a/0x708
[    0.466702]  [<0000000001cb6140>] start_kernel+0x80/0x5c8
[    0.466727]  [<0000000000100036>] startup_continue+0x36/0x40

it happens because such system tries to access some vmap areas
whereas the vmalloc initialization is not even yet done:

[    0.465490] lock: single+0x1860/0x1958, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
[    0.466067] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.8.0-12955-g8e938e39 #1
[    0.466188] Hardware name: QEMU 8561 QEMU (KVM/Linux)
[    0.466270] Call Trace:
[    0.466470] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117)
[    0.466516] do_raw_spin_lock (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:87 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:115)
[    0.466545] find_vmap_area (mm/vmalloc.c:1059 mm/vmalloc.c:2364)
[    0.466572] find_vm_area (mm/vmalloc.c:3150)
[    0.466597] __set_memory (arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c:360 arch/s390/mm/pageattr.c:393)
[    0.466624] vmem_map_init (./arch/s390/include/asm/set_memory.h:55 arch/s390/mm/vmem.c:660)
[    0.466651] paging_init (arch/s390/mm/init.c:97)
[    0.466677] setup_arch (arch/s390/kernel/setup.c:972)
[    0.466702] start_kernel (init/main.c:899)
[    0.466727] startup_continue (arch/s390/kernel/head64.S:35)
[    0.466811] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
...
[    0.718250] vmalloc init - busy lock init 0000000002871860
[    0.718328] vmalloc init - busy lock init 00000000028731b8

Some background. It worked before because the lock that is in question
was statically defined and initialized. As of now, the locks and data
structures are initialized in the vmalloc_init() function.

To address that issue add the check whether the "vmap_initialized"
variable is set, if not find_vmap_area() bails out on entry returning NULL.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240323141544.4150-1-urezki@gmail.com
Fixes: 72210662 ("mm: vmalloc: offload free_vmap_area_lock lock")
Signed-off-by: default avatarUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent 8434f9aa
...@@ -2343,6 +2343,9 @@ struct vmap_area *find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr) ...@@ -2343,6 +2343,9 @@ struct vmap_area *find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr)
struct vmap_area *va; struct vmap_area *va;
int i, j; int i, j;
if (unlikely(!vmap_initialized))
return NULL;
/* /*
* An addr_to_node_id(addr) converts an address to a node index * An addr_to_node_id(addr) converts an address to a node index
* where a VA is located. If VA spans several zones and passed * where a VA is located. If VA spans several zones and passed
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment