Commit 4f4124d0 authored by Chao Yu's avatar Chao Yu Committed by Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: update several comments

Update several comments:
1. use f2fs_{un}lock_op install of mutex_{un}lock_op.
2. update comment of get_data_block().
3. update description of node offset.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
parent 7e8f2308
......@@ -508,8 +508,8 @@ struct page *get_lock_data_page(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
* Caller ensures that this data page is never allocated.
* A new zero-filled data page is allocated in the page cache.
*
* Also, caller should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and
* mutex_unlock_op().
* Also, caller should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and
* f2fs_unlock_op().
* Note that, npage is set only by make_empty_dir.
*/
struct page *get_new_data_page(struct inode *inode,
......@@ -595,10 +595,12 @@ static int __allocate_data_block(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
}
/*
* This function should be used by the data read flow only where it
* does not check the "create" flag that indicates block allocation.
* The reason for this special functionality is to exploit VFS readahead
* mechanism.
* get_data_block() now supported readahead/bmap/rw direct_IO with mapped bh.
* If original data blocks are allocated, then give them to blockdev.
* Otherwise,
* a. preallocate requested block addresses
* b. do not use extent cache for better performance
* c. give the block addresses to blockdev
*/
static int get_data_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create)
......
......@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ static int room_for_filename(struct f2fs_dentry_block *dentry_blk, int slots)
}
/*
* Caller should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and
* mutex_unlock_op().
* Caller should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and
* f2fs_unlock_op().
*/
int __f2fs_add_link(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *name, struct inode *inode)
{
......
......@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ enum {
LOOKUP_NODE, /* look up a node without readahead */
LOOKUP_NODE_RA, /*
* look up a node with readahead called
* by get_datablock_ro.
* by get_data_block.
*/
};
......
......@@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ static int get_node_path(struct f2fs_inode_info *fi, long block,
/*
* Caller should call f2fs_put_dnode(dn).
* Also, it should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and
* mutex_unlock_op() only if ro is not set RDONLY_NODE.
* Also, it should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and
* f2fs_unlock_op() only if ro is not set RDONLY_NODE.
* In the case of RDONLY_NODE, we don't need to care about mutex.
*/
int get_dnode_of_data(struct dnode_of_data *dn, pgoff_t index, int mode)
......@@ -802,8 +802,8 @@ int truncate_xattr_node(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
}
/*
* Caller should grab and release a mutex by calling mutex_lock_op() and
* mutex_unlock_op().
* Caller should grab and release a rwsem by calling f2fs_lock_op() and
* f2fs_unlock_op().
*/
void remove_inode_page(struct inode *inode)
{
......
......@@ -224,7 +224,13 @@ static inline block_t next_blkaddr_of_node(struct page *node_page)
* | `- direct node (5 + N => 5 + 2N - 1)
* `- double indirect node (5 + 2N)
* `- indirect node (6 + 2N)
* `- direct node (x(N + 1))
* `- direct node
* ......
* `- indirect node ((6 + 2N) + x(N + 1))
* `- direct node
* ......
* `- indirect node ((6 + 2N) + (N - 1)(N + 1))
* `- direct node
*/
static inline bool IS_DNODE(struct page *node_page)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment