Commit 4fd94ec7 authored by Ben Gardon's avatar Ben Gardon Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: selftests: Introduce the dirty log perf test

The dirty log perf test will time verious dirty logging operations
(enabling dirty logging, dirtying memory, getting the dirty log,
clearing the dirty log, and disabling dirty logging) in order to
quantify dirty logging performance. This test can be used to inform
future performance improvements to KVM's dirty logging infrastructure.

This series was tested by running the following invocations on an Intel
Skylake machine:
dirty_log_perf_test -b 20m -i 100 -v 64
dirty_log_perf_test -b 20g -i 5 -v 4
dirty_log_perf_test -b 4g -i 5 -v 32
demand_paging_test -b 20m -v 64
demand_paging_test -b 20g -v 4
demand_paging_test -b 4g -v 32
All behaved as expected.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20201027233733.1484855-6-bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 3be18630
...@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ ...@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
/clear_dirty_log_test /clear_dirty_log_test
/demand_paging_test /demand_paging_test
/dirty_log_test /dirty_log_test
/dirty_log_perf_test
/kvm_create_max_vcpus /kvm_create_max_vcpus
/set_memory_region_test /set_memory_region_test
/steal_time /steal_time
...@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/tsc_msrs_test ...@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/tsc_msrs_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/user_msr_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/user_msr_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += demand_paging_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += demand_paging_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_perf_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += set_memory_region_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += set_memory_region_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += steal_time TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += steal_time
......
This diff is collapsed.
...@@ -76,16 +76,18 @@ static void guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_id) ...@@ -76,16 +76,18 @@ static void guest_code(uint32_t vcpu_id)
gva = vcpu_args->gva; gva = vcpu_args->gva;
pages = vcpu_args->pages; pages = vcpu_args->pages;
for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) { while (true) {
uint64_t addr = gva + (i * perf_test_args.guest_page_size); for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
uint64_t addr = gva + (i * perf_test_args.guest_page_size);
if (i % perf_test_args.wr_fract == 0) if (i % perf_test_args.wr_fract == 0)
*(uint64_t *)addr = 0x0123456789ABCDEF; *(uint64_t *)addr = 0x0123456789ABCDEF;
else else
READ_ONCE(*(uint64_t *)addr); READ_ONCE(*(uint64_t *)addr);
} }
GUEST_SYNC(1); GUEST_SYNC(1);
}
} }
static struct kvm_vm *create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int vcpus, static struct kvm_vm *create_vm(enum vm_guest_mode mode, int vcpus,
......
...@@ -65,5 +65,6 @@ struct timespec timespec_add_ns(struct timespec ts, int64_t ns); ...@@ -65,5 +65,6 @@ struct timespec timespec_add_ns(struct timespec ts, int64_t ns);
struct timespec timespec_add(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2); struct timespec timespec_add(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2);
struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2); struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec ts1, struct timespec ts2);
struct timespec timespec_diff_now(struct timespec start); struct timespec timespec_diff_now(struct timespec start);
struct timespec timespec_div(struct timespec ts, int divisor);
#endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_TEST_UTIL_H */ #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_TEST_UTIL_H */
...@@ -92,6 +92,13 @@ struct timespec timespec_diff_now(struct timespec start) ...@@ -92,6 +92,13 @@ struct timespec timespec_diff_now(struct timespec start)
return timespec_sub(end, start); return timespec_sub(end, start);
} }
struct timespec timespec_div(struct timespec ts, int divisor)
{
int64_t ns = timespec_to_ns(ts) / divisor;
return timespec_add_ns((struct timespec){0}, ns);
}
void print_skip(const char *fmt, ...) void print_skip(const char *fmt, ...)
{ {
va_list ap; va_list ap;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment