Commit 52a227b3 authored by Petr Machata's avatar Petr Machata Committed by David S. Miller

mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD/_DEL

Following patches will change the way of distributing port object
changes from a switchdev operation to a switchdev notifier. The
switchdev code currently recursively descends through layers of lower
devices, eventually calling the op on a front-panel port device. The
notifier will instead be sent referencing the bridge port device, which
may be a stacking device that's one of front-panel ports uppers, or a
completely unrelated device.

To handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD and _DEL, subscribe to the blocking
notifier chain. Dispatch to mlxsw_sp_port_obj_add() resp. _del() to
maintain the behavior that the switchdev operation based code currently
has. Defer to switchdev_handle_port_obj_add() / _del() to handle the
recursive descend, because mlxsw supports a number of upper types.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f30f0601
......@@ -3118,6 +3118,32 @@ static struct notifier_block mlxsw_sp_switchdev_notifier = {
.notifier_call = mlxsw_sp_switchdev_event,
};
static int mlxsw_sp_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
unsigned long event, void *ptr)
{
struct net_device *dev = switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
int err;
switch (event) {
case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD:
err = switchdev_handle_port_obj_add(dev, ptr,
mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check,
mlxsw_sp_port_obj_add);
return notifier_from_errno(err);
case SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_DEL:
err = switchdev_handle_port_obj_del(dev, ptr,
mlxsw_sp_port_dev_check,
mlxsw_sp_port_obj_del);
return notifier_from_errno(err);
}
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
static struct notifier_block mlxsw_sp_switchdev_blocking_notifier = {
.notifier_call = mlxsw_sp_switchdev_blocking_event,
};
u8
mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_stp_state(struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_port *bridge_port)
{
......@@ -3127,6 +3153,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_bridge_port_stp_state(struct mlxsw_sp_bridge_port *bridge_port)
static int mlxsw_sp_fdb_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
{
struct mlxsw_sp_bridge *bridge = mlxsw_sp->bridge;
struct notifier_block *nb;
int err;
err = mlxsw_sp_ageing_set(mlxsw_sp, MLXSW_SP_DEFAULT_AGEING_TIME);
......@@ -3141,17 +3168,33 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_fdb_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
return err;
}
nb = &mlxsw_sp_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
err = register_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
if (err) {
dev_err(mlxsw_sp->bus_info->dev, "Failed to register switchdev blocking notifier\n");
goto err_register_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
}
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bridge->fdb_notify.dw, mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work);
bridge->fdb_notify.interval = MLXSW_SP_DEFAULT_LEARNING_INTERVAL;
mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work_schedule(mlxsw_sp);
return 0;
err_register_switchdev_blocking_notifier:
unregister_switchdev_notifier(&mlxsw_sp_switchdev_notifier);
return err;
}
static void mlxsw_sp_fdb_fini(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
{
struct notifier_block *nb;
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&mlxsw_sp->bridge->fdb_notify.dw);
unregister_switchdev_notifier(&mlxsw_sp_switchdev_notifier);
nb = &mlxsw_sp_switchdev_blocking_notifier;
unregister_switchdev_blocking_notifier(nb);
unregister_switchdev_notifier(&mlxsw_sp_switchdev_notifier);
}
int mlxsw_sp_switchdev_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment