crypto: chacha20poly1305 - set cra_name correctly

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832661

commit 5e27f38f upstream.

If the rfc7539 template is instantiated with specific implementations,
e.g. "rfc7539(chacha20-generic,poly1305-generic)" rather than
"rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", then the implementation names end up
included in the instance's cra_name.  This is incorrect because it then
prevents all users from allocating "rfc7539(chacha20,poly1305)", if the
highest priority implementations of chacha20 and poly1305 were selected.
Also, the self-tests aren't run on an instance allocated in this way.

Fix it by setting the instance's cra_name from the underlying
algorithms' actual cra_names, rather than from the requested names.
This matches what other templates do.

Fixes: 71ebc4d1 ("crypto: chacha20poly1305 - Add a ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD construction, RFC7539")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2+
Cc: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>

crypto/chacha20poly1305.c

@@ -637,8 +637,8 @@ static int chachapoly_create(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb,
 
 	err = -ENAMETOOLONG;
 	if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
-		     "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha_name,
-		     poly_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
+		     "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->cra_name,
+		     poly->cra_name) >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME)
 		goto out_drop_chacha;
 	if (snprintf(inst->alg.base.cra_driver_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME,
 		     "%s(%s,%s)", name, chacha->cra_driver_name,