Commit 53ca0f2f authored by Taehee Yoo's avatar Taehee Yoo Committed by Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: nf_conncount: remove wrong condition check routine

All lists that reach the tree_nodes_free() function have both zero
counter and true dead flag. The reason for this is that lists to be
release are selected by nf_conncount_gc_list() which already decrements
the list counter and sets on the dead flag. Therefore, this if statement
in tree_nodes_free() is unnecessary and wrong.

Fixes: 31568ec0 ("netfilter: nf_conncount: fix list_del corruption in conn_free")
Signed-off-by: default avatarTaehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
parent 095faf45
...@@ -323,11 +323,8 @@ static void tree_nodes_free(struct rb_root *root, ...@@ -323,11 +323,8 @@ static void tree_nodes_free(struct rb_root *root,
while (gc_count) { while (gc_count) {
rbconn = gc_nodes[--gc_count]; rbconn = gc_nodes[--gc_count];
spin_lock(&rbconn->list.list_lock); spin_lock(&rbconn->list.list_lock);
if (rbconn->list.count == 0 && rbconn->list.dead == false) { rb_erase(&rbconn->node, root);
rbconn->list.dead = true; call_rcu(&rbconn->rcu_head, __tree_nodes_free);
rb_erase(&rbconn->node, root);
call_rcu(&rbconn->rcu_head, __tree_nodes_free);
}
spin_unlock(&rbconn->list.list_lock); spin_unlock(&rbconn->list.list_lock);
} }
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment