Commit 5559b2d8 authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara Committed by Theodore Ts'o

jbd2: Drop pointless wakeup from jbd2_journal_stop()

When we drop last handle from a transaction and journal->j_barrier_count
> 0, jbd2_journal_stop() wakes up journal->j_wait_transaction_locked
wait queue. This looks pointless - wait for outstanding handles always
happens on journal->j_wait_updates waitqueue.
journal->j_wait_transaction_locked is used to wait for transaction state
changes and by start_this_handle() for waiting until
journal->j_barrier_count drops to 0. The first case is clearly
irrelevant here since only jbd2 thread changes transaction state. The
second case looks related but jbd2_journal_unlock_updates() is
responsible for the wakeup in this case. So just drop the wakeup.
Reviewed-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191105164437.32602-16-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
parent 150549ed
......@@ -1831,11 +1831,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_stop(handle_t *handle)
* once we do this, we must not dereference transaction
* pointer again.
*/
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&transaction->t_updates)) {
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&transaction->t_updates))
wake_up(&journal->j_wait_updates);
if (journal->j_barrier_count)
wake_up(&journal->j_wait_transaction_locked);
}
rwsem_release(&journal->j_trans_commit_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment