Commit 556b8883 authored by Dave Chinner's avatar Dave Chinner Committed by Dave Chinner

xfs: xfs_readsb needs to check for magic numbers

Commit daba5427 ("xfs: skip verification on initial "guess"
superblock read") dropped the use of a verifier for the initial
superblock read so we can probe the sector size of the filesystem
stored in the superblock. It, however, now fails to validate that
what was read initially is actually an XFS superblock and hence will
fail the sector size check and return ENOSYS.

This causes probe-based mounts to fail because it expects XFS to
return EINVAL when it doesn't recognise the superblock format.

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reported-by: default avatarPlamen Petrov <plamen.sisi@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avatarPlamen Petrov <plamen.sisi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
parent 1f6d6482
......@@ -323,8 +323,19 @@ xfs_readsb(
/*
* Initialize the mount structure from the superblock.
*/
xfs_sb_from_disk(&mp->m_sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp));
xfs_sb_quota_from_disk(&mp->m_sb);
xfs_sb_from_disk(sbp, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp));
xfs_sb_quota_from_disk(sbp);
/*
* If we haven't validated the superblock, do so now before we try
* to check the sector size and reread the superblock appropriately.
*/
if (sbp->sb_magicnum != XFS_SB_MAGIC) {
if (loud)
xfs_warn(mp, "Invalid superblock magic number");
error = EINVAL;
goto release_buf;
}
/*
* We must be able to do sector-sized and sector-aligned IO.
......@@ -337,11 +348,11 @@ xfs_readsb(
goto release_buf;
}
/*
* Re-read the superblock so the buffer is correctly sized,
* and properly verified.
*/
if (buf_ops == NULL) {
/*
* Re-read the superblock so the buffer is correctly sized,
* and properly verified.
*/
xfs_buf_relse(bp);
sector_size = sbp->sb_sectsize;
buf_ops = loud ? &xfs_sb_buf_ops : &xfs_sb_quiet_buf_ops;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment