Commit 55d2eba8 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra

jump_label: Fix usage in module __init

When the static_key is part of the module, and the module calls
static_key_inc/enable() from it's __init section *AND* has a
static_branch_*() user in that very same __init section, things go
wobbly.

If the static_key lives outside the module, jump_label_add_module()
would append this module's sites to the key and jump_label_update()
would take the static_key_linked() branch and all would be fine.

If all the sites are outside of __init, then everything will be fine
too.

However, when all is aligned just as described above,
jump_label_update() calls __jump_label_update(.init = false) and we'll
not update sites in __init text.

Fixes: 19483677 ("jump_label: Annotate entries that operate on __init code earlier")
Reported-by: default avatarDexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201216135435.GV3092@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
parent 2c85ebc5
......@@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ int jump_label_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
static void jump_label_update(struct static_key *key)
{
struct jump_entry *stop = __stop___jump_table;
bool init = system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING;
struct jump_entry *entry;
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
struct module *mod;
......@@ -804,15 +805,16 @@ static void jump_label_update(struct static_key *key)
preempt_disable();
mod = __module_address((unsigned long)key);
if (mod)
if (mod) {
stop = mod->jump_entries + mod->num_jump_entries;
init = mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING;
}
preempt_enable();
#endif
entry = static_key_entries(key);
/* if there are no users, entry can be NULL */
if (entry)
__jump_label_update(key, entry, stop,
system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING);
__jump_label_update(key, entry, stop, init);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_KEYS_SELFTEST
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment