alarmtimer: Prevent overflow for relative nanosleep

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798770

[ Upstream commit 5f936e19 ]

Air Icy reported:

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in kernel/time/alarmtimer.c:811:7
  signed integer overflow:
  1529859276030040771 + 9223372036854775807 cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
  Call Trace:
   alarm_timer_nsleep+0x44c/0x510 kernel/time/alarmtimer.c:811
   __do_sys_clock_nanosleep kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1235 [inline]
   __se_sys_clock_nanosleep kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1213 [inline]
   __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep+0x326/0x4e0 kernel/time/posix-timers.c:1213
   do_syscall_64+0xb8/0x3a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290

alarm_timer_nsleep() uses ktime_add() to add the current time and the
relative expiry value. ktime_add() has no sanity checks so the addition
can overflow when the relative timeout is large enough.

Use ktime_add_safe() which has the necessary sanity checks in place and
limits the result to the valid range.

Fixes: 9a7adcf5 ("timers: Posix interface for alarm-timers")
Reported-by: Team OWL337 <icytxw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1807020926360.1595@nanos.tec.linutronix.deSigned-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>

kernel/time/alarmtimer.c

@@ -773,7 +773,8 @@ static int alarm_timer_nsleep(const clockid_t which_clock, int flags,
 	/* Convert (if necessary) to absolute time */
 	if (flags != TIMER_ABSTIME) {
 		ktime_t now = alarm_bases[type].gettime();
-		exp = ktime_add(now, exp);
+
+		exp = ktime_add_safe(now, exp);
 	}
 
 	if (alarmtimer_do_nsleep(&alarm, exp))