Commit 58415918 authored by A.Sunil Kamath's avatar A.Sunil Kamath Committed by Ander Conselvan de Oliveira

drm/i915: Use num_scalers instead of SKL_NUM_SCALERS in debugfs

Better to use num_scaler itself while printing scaler_info.
This fixes a bug of printing information for the missing
second scaler on pipe C for SKL platform.
Signed-off-by: default avatarA.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479664226-22307-1-git-send-email-sunil.kamath@intel.com
parent 381744f8
...@@ -3080,7 +3080,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc) ...@@ -3080,7 +3080,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users, pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users,
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id); pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id);
for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) { for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) {
struct intel_scaler *sc = struct intel_scaler *sc =
&pipe_config->scaler_state.scalers[i]; &pipe_config->scaler_state.scalers[i];
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment