Commit 59fe6752 authored by Valentin Schneider's avatar Valentin Schneider Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/uclamp: Remove uclamp_util()

The sole user of uclamp_util(), schedutil_cpu_util(), was made to use
uclamp_util_with() instead in commit:

  af24bde8 ("sched/uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute()")

From then on, uclamp_util() has remained unused. Being a simple wrapper
around uclamp_util_with(), we can get rid of it and win back a few lines.
Tested-By: default avatarDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211113851.24241-2-valentin.schneider@arm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 17346452
...@@ -2324,21 +2324,12 @@ unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util, ...@@ -2324,21 +2324,12 @@ unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
return clamp(util, min_util, max_util); return clamp(util, min_util, max_util);
} }
static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
{
return uclamp_util_with(rq, util, NULL);
}
#else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
static inline unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util, static inline unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
struct task_struct *p) struct task_struct *p)
{ {
return util; return util;
} }
static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
{
return util;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ #endif /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
#ifdef arch_scale_freq_capacity #ifdef arch_scale_freq_capacity
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment