Commit 5a1c72e0 authored by Paolo Bonzini's avatar Paolo Bonzini

Merge tag 'kvm-x86-mmu-6.10' of https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux into HEAD

KVM x86 MMU changes for 6.10:

 - Process TDP MMU SPTEs that are are zapped while holding mmu_lock for read
   after replacing REMOVED_SPTE with '0' and flushing remote TLBs, which allows
   vCPU tasks to repopulate the zapped region while the zapper finishes tearing
   down the old, defunct page tables.

 - Fix a longstanding, likely benign-in-practice race where KVM could fail to
   detect a write from kvm_mmu_track_write() to a shadowed GPTE if the GPTE is
   first page table being shadowed.
parents dee7ea42 226d9b8f
......@@ -831,6 +831,15 @@ static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
gfn_t gfn;
kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages++;
/*
* Ensure indirect_shadow_pages is elevated prior to re-reading guest
* child PTEs in FNAME(gpte_changed), i.e. guarantee either in-flight
* emulated writes are visible before re-reading guest PTEs, or that
* an emulated write will see the elevated count and acquire mmu_lock
* to update SPTEs. Pairs with the smp_mb() in kvm_mmu_track_write().
*/
smp_mb();
gfn = sp->gfn;
slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
......@@ -5787,10 +5796,15 @@ void kvm_mmu_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
bool flush = false;
/*
* If we don't have indirect shadow pages, it means no page is
* write-protected, so we can exit simply.
* When emulating guest writes, ensure the written value is visible to
* any task that is handling page faults before checking whether or not
* KVM is shadowing a guest PTE. This ensures either KVM will create
* the correct SPTE in the page fault handler, or this task will see
* a non-zero indirect_shadow_pages. Pairs with the smp_mb() in
* account_shadowed().
*/
if (!READ_ONCE(vcpu->kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages))
smp_mb();
if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages)
return;
write_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
......
......@@ -530,6 +530,31 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
}
static inline int __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct tdp_iter *iter, u64 new_spte)
{
u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(iter->sptep);
/*
* The caller is responsible for ensuring the old SPTE is not a REMOVED
* SPTE. KVM should never attempt to zap or manipulate a REMOVED SPTE,
* and pre-checking before inserting a new SPTE is advantageous as it
* avoids unnecessary work.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded || is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte));
/*
* Note, fast_pf_fix_direct_spte() can also modify TDP MMU SPTEs and
* does not hold the mmu_lock. On failure, i.e. if a different logical
* CPU modified the SPTE, try_cmpxchg64() updates iter->old_spte with
* the current value, so the caller operates on fresh data, e.g. if it
* retries tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic()
*/
if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte))
return -EBUSY;
return 0;
}
/*
* tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic - Set a TDP MMU SPTE atomically
* and handle the associated bookkeeping. Do not mark the page dirty
......@@ -551,27 +576,13 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
struct tdp_iter *iter,
u64 new_spte)
{
u64 *sptep = rcu_dereference(iter->sptep);
/*
* The caller is responsible for ensuring the old SPTE is not a REMOVED
* SPTE. KVM should never attempt to zap or manipulate a REMOVED SPTE,
* and pre-checking before inserting a new SPTE is advantageous as it
* avoids unnecessary work.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->yielded || is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte));
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
/*
* Note, fast_pf_fix_direct_spte() can also modify TDP MMU SPTEs and
* does not hold the mmu_lock. On failure, i.e. if a different logical
* CPU modified the SPTE, try_cmpxchg64() updates iter->old_spte with
* the current value, so the caller operates on fresh data, e.g. if it
* retries tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic()
*/
if (!try_cmpxchg64(sptep, &iter->old_spte, new_spte))
return -EBUSY;
ret = __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(iter, new_spte);
if (ret)
return ret;
handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
new_spte, iter->level, true);
......@@ -584,13 +595,17 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
{
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
/*
* Freeze the SPTE by setting it to a special,
* non-present value. This will stop other threads from
* immediately installing a present entry in its place
* before the TLBs are flushed.
* Freeze the SPTE by setting it to a special, non-present value. This
* will stop other threads from immediately installing a present entry
* in its place before the TLBs are flushed.
*
* Delay processing of the zapped SPTE until after TLBs are flushed and
* the REMOVED_SPTE is replaced (see below).
*/
ret = tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, iter, REMOVED_SPTE);
ret = __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(iter, REMOVED_SPTE);
if (ret)
return ret;
......@@ -599,12 +614,20 @@ static inline int tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
/*
* No other thread can overwrite the removed SPTE as they must either
* wait on the MMU lock or use tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() which will not
* overwrite the special removed SPTE value. No bookkeeping is needed
* here since the SPTE is going from non-present to non-present. Use
* the raw write helper to avoid an unnecessary check on volatile bits.
* overwrite the special removed SPTE value. Use the raw write helper to
* avoid an unnecessary check on volatile bits.
*/
__kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE);
/*
* Process the zapped SPTE after flushing TLBs, and after replacing
* REMOVED_SPTE with 0. This minimizes the amount of time vCPUs are
* blocked by the REMOVED_SPTE and reduces contention on the child
* SPTEs.
*/
handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
0, iter->level, true);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment