Commit 5f17cfce authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds

PCI: fix pbus_size_mem() resource alignment for CardBus controllers

Commit 88452565 ("PCI: clean up resource
alignment management") changed the resource handling to mark how a
resource was aligned on a per-resource basis.

Thus, instead of looking at the resource number to determine whether it
was a bridge resource or a regular resource (they have different
alignment rules), we should just ask the resource for its alignment
directly.

The reason this broke only cardbus resources was that for the other
types of resources, the old way of deciding alignment actually still
happened to work.  But CardBus bridge resources had been changed by
commit 934b7024 ("Fix cardbus resource
allocation") to look more like regular resources than PCI bridge
resources from an alignment handling standpoint.
Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent de014d61
......@@ -352,11 +352,12 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask, unsigned long
continue;
r_size = r->end - r->start + 1;
/* For bridges size != alignment */
align = (i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) ? r_size : r->start;
align = resource_alignment(r);
order = __ffs(align) - 20;
if (order > 11) {
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "BAR %d too large: "
dev_warn(&dev->dev, "BAR %d bad alignment %llx: "
"%#016llx-%#016llx\n", i,
(unsigned long long)align,
(unsigned long long)r->start,
(unsigned long long)r->end);
r->flags = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment