Commit 5fc894bb authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Linus Torvalds

signals: send_sigqueue: don't forget about handle_stop_signal()

send_group_sigqueue() calls handle_stop_signal(), send_sigqueue() doesn't.
This is not consistent and in fact I'd say this is (minor) bug.

Move handle_stop_signal() from send_group_sigqueue() to do_send_sigqueue(),
the latter is called by send_sigqueue() too.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 5c193e88
......@@ -1274,8 +1274,10 @@ void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q)
}
static int do_send_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t,
struct sigpending *pending)
struct sigpending *pending)
{
handle_stop_signal(sig, t);
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
/*
* If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
......@@ -1335,7 +1337,6 @@ send_group_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *p)
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
/* Since it_lock is held, p->sighand cannot be NULL. */
spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
ret = do_send_sigqueue(sig, q, p, &p->signal->shared_pending);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment