Commit 61584032 authored by Dongli Zhang's avatar Dongli Zhang Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

loop: set GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part()

[ Upstream commit 758a58d0 ]

Commit 0da03cab
("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()") moves
blkdev_reread_part() out of the loop_ctl_mutex. However,
GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN is set before __blkdev_reread_part(). As a result,
__blkdev_reread_part() will fail the check of GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN and
will not rescan the loop device to delete all partitions.

Below are steps to reproduce the issue:

step1 # dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.raw bs=1M count=100
step2 # losetup -P /dev/loop0 tmp.raw
step3 # parted /dev/loop0 mklabel gpt
step4 # parted -a none -s /dev/loop0 mkpart primary 64s 1
step5 # losetup -d /dev/loop0

Step5 will not be able to delete /dev/loop0p1 (introduced by step4) and
there is below kernel warning message:

[  464.414043] __loop_clr_fd: partition scan of loop0 failed (rc=-22)

This patch sets GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part().

Fixes: 0da03cab ("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
parent 07a31820
...@@ -1090,16 +1090,12 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release) ...@@ -1090,16 +1090,12 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(bdev->bd_disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE); kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(bdev->bd_disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
} }
mapping_set_gfp_mask(filp->f_mapping, gfp); mapping_set_gfp_mask(filp->f_mapping, gfp);
lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
/* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */ /* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
module_put(THIS_MODULE); module_put(THIS_MODULE);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue); blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev; partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev;
lo_number = lo->lo_number; lo_number = lo->lo_number;
lo->lo_flags = 0;
if (!part_shift)
lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
loop_unprepare_queue(lo); loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
out_unlock: out_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
...@@ -1121,6 +1117,23 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release) ...@@ -1121,6 +1117,23 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
/* Device is gone, no point in returning error */ /* Device is gone, no point in returning error */
err = 0; err = 0;
} }
/*
* lo->lo_state is set to Lo_unbound here after above partscan has
* finished.
*
* There cannot be anybody else entering __loop_clr_fd() as
* lo->lo_backing_file is already cleared and Lo_rundown state
* protects us from all the other places trying to change the 'lo'
* device.
*/
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
lo->lo_flags = 0;
if (!part_shift)
lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
/* /*
* Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file. * Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
* Calling fput holding loop_ctl_mutex triggers a circular * Calling fput holding loop_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment