Commit 622d1369 authored by Ong Boon Leong's avatar Ong Boon Leong Committed by David S. Miller

xdp: fix xdp_return_frame() kernel BUG throw for page_pool memory model

xdp_return_frame() may be called outside of NAPI context to return
xdpf back to page_pool. xdp_return_frame() calls __xdp_return() with
napi_direct = false. For page_pool memory model, __xdp_return() calls
xdp_return_frame_no_direct() unconditionally and below false negative
kernel BUG throw happened under preempt-rt build:

[  430.450355] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: modprobe/3884
[  430.451678] caller is __xdp_return+0x1ff/0x2e0
[  430.452111] CPU: 0 PID: 3884 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G     U      E     5.12.0-rc2+ #45

Changes in v2:
 - This patch fixes the issue by making xdp_return_frame_no_direct() is
   only called if napi_direct = true, as recommended for better by
   Jesper Dangaard Brouer. Thanks!

Fixes: 2539650f ("xdp: Helpers for disabling napi_direct of xdp_return_frame")
Signed-off-by: default avatarOng Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent c609e6aa
...@@ -350,7 +350,8 @@ static void __xdp_return(void *data, struct xdp_mem_info *mem, bool napi_direct, ...@@ -350,7 +350,8 @@ static void __xdp_return(void *data, struct xdp_mem_info *mem, bool napi_direct,
/* mem->id is valid, checked in xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() */ /* mem->id is valid, checked in xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() */
xa = rhashtable_lookup(mem_id_ht, &mem->id, mem_id_rht_params); xa = rhashtable_lookup(mem_id_ht, &mem->id, mem_id_rht_params);
page = virt_to_head_page(data); page = virt_to_head_page(data);
napi_direct &= !xdp_return_frame_no_direct(); if (napi_direct && xdp_return_frame_no_direct())
napi_direct = false;
page_pool_put_full_page(xa->page_pool, page, napi_direct); page_pool_put_full_page(xa->page_pool, page, napi_direct);
rcu_read_unlock(); rcu_read_unlock();
break; break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment