Commit 63ded110 authored by Jiri Olsa's avatar Jiri Olsa Committed by Masami Hiramatsu (Google)

uprobe: Change uretprobe syscall scope and number

After discussing with Arnd [1] it's preferable to change uretprobe
syscall number to 467 to omit the merge conflict with xattrat syscalls.

Also changing the ABI to 'common' which will ease up the global
scripts/syscall.tbl management. One consequence is we generate uretprobe
syscall numbers for ABIs that do not support uretprobe syscall, but the
syscall still returns -ENOSYS when called in that ABI.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/784a34e5-4654-44c9-9c07-f9f4ffd952a0@app.fastmail.com/

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240712135228.1619332-2-jolsa@kernel.org/

Fixes: 190fec72 ("uprobe: Wire up uretprobe system call")
Suggested-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
parent b10545b6
...@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ ...@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@
460 common lsm_set_self_attr sys_lsm_set_self_attr 460 common lsm_set_self_attr sys_lsm_set_self_attr
461 common lsm_list_modules sys_lsm_list_modules 461 common lsm_list_modules sys_lsm_list_modules
462 common mseal sys_mseal 462 common mseal sys_mseal
463 64 uretprobe sys_uretprobe 467 common uretprobe sys_uretprobe
# #
# Due to a historical design error, certain syscalls are numbered differently # Due to a historical design error, certain syscalls are numbered differently
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment