Commit 6453b953 authored by Andy Shevchenko's avatar Andy Shevchenko Committed by Bartosz Golaszewski

gpio: xilinx: No need to disable IRQs in the handler

In IRQ handler interrupts are already disabled, hence no need
to repeat it. Even in the threaded case, it is not a problem
because IRQ framework keeps interrupt disabled there as well.
Remove disabling IRQ part in the handler.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarNeeli Srinivas <sneeli@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
parent 02b3f84d
......@@ -509,14 +509,13 @@ static void xgpio_irqhandler(struct irq_desc *desc)
int irq_offset;
u32 status;
u32 bit;
unsigned long flags;
status = xgpio_readreg(chip->regs + XGPIO_IPISR_OFFSET);
xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_IPISR_OFFSET, status);
chained_irq_enter(irqchip, desc);
spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&chip->gpio_lock);
xgpio_read_ch_all(chip, XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET, all);
......@@ -533,7 +532,7 @@ static void xgpio_irqhandler(struct irq_desc *desc)
bitmap_copy(chip->last_irq_read, all, 64);
bitmap_or(all, rising, falling, 64);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
spin_unlock(&chip->gpio_lock);
dev_dbg(gc->parent, "IRQ rising %*pb falling %*pb\n", 64, rising, 64, falling);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment