Commit 6469272c authored by Julia Lawall's avatar Julia Lawall Committed by Joel Becker

fs/ocfs2/dlm: Add missing spin_unlock

Add a spin_unlock missing on the error path.  Unlock as in the other code
that leads to the leave label.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression E1;
@@

* spin_lock(E1,...);
  <+... when != E1
  if (...) {
    ... when != E1
*   return ...;
  }
  ...+>
* spin_unlock(E1,...);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
parent 7e27d6e7
...@@ -1709,6 +1709,7 @@ struct dlm_ctxt * dlm_register_domain(const char *domain, ...@@ -1709,6 +1709,7 @@ struct dlm_ctxt * dlm_register_domain(const char *domain,
} }
if (dlm_protocol_compare(&dlm->fs_locking_proto, fs_proto)) { if (dlm_protocol_compare(&dlm->fs_locking_proto, fs_proto)) {
spin_unlock(&dlm_domain_lock);
mlog(ML_ERROR, mlog(ML_ERROR,
"Requested locking protocol version is not " "Requested locking protocol version is not "
"compatible with already registered domain " "compatible with already registered domain "
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment