Commit 688d2e8d authored by Namhyung Kim's avatar Namhyung Kim Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf lock contention: Add -l/--lock-addr option

The -l/--lock-addr option is to implement per-lock-instance contention
stat using LOCK_AGGR_ADDR.  It displays lock address and optionally
symbol name if exists.

  $ sudo ./perf lock con -abl sleep 1
   contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait            address   symbol

           1     36.28 us     36.28 us     36.28 us   ffff92615d6448b8
           9     10.91 us      1.84 us      1.21 us   ffffffffbaed50c0   rcu_state
           1     10.49 us     10.49 us     10.49 us   ffff9262ac4f0c80
           8      4.68 us      1.67 us       585 ns   ffffffffbae07a40   jiffies_lock
           3      3.03 us      1.45 us      1.01 us   ffff9262277861e0
           1       924 ns       924 ns       924 ns   ffff926095ba9d20
           1       436 ns       436 ns       436 ns   ffff9260bfda4f60
Signed-off-by: default avatarNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Blake Jones <blakejones@google.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209190727.759804-4-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent eca949b2
......@@ -168,6 +168,10 @@ CONTENTION OPTIONS
--entries=<value>::
Display this many entries.
-l::
--lock-addr::
Show lock contention stat by address
SEE ALSO
--------
......
......@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static struct rb_root thread_stats;
static bool combine_locks;
static bool show_thread_stats;
static bool show_lock_addrs;
static bool use_bpf;
static unsigned long bpf_map_entries = 10240;
static int max_stack_depth = CONTENTION_STACK_DEPTH;
......@@ -999,13 +1000,32 @@ static int report_lock_contention_begin_event(struct evsel *evsel,
ls = lock_stat_find(key);
if (!ls) {
char buf[128];
const char *caller = buf;
const char *name = "";
unsigned int flags = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "flags");
struct machine *machine = &session->machines.host;
struct map *kmap;
struct symbol *sym;
switch (aggr_mode) {
case LOCK_AGGR_ADDR:
/* make sure it loads the kernel map to find lock symbols */
map__load(machine__kernel_map(machine));
sym = machine__find_kernel_symbol(machine, key, &kmap);
if (sym)
name = sym->name;
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_CALLER:
name = buf;
if (lock_contention_caller(evsel, sample, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0)
name = "Unknown";
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_TASK:
default:
break;
}
if (lock_contention_caller(evsel, sample, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0)
caller = "Unknown";
ls = lock_stat_findnew(key, caller, flags);
ls = lock_stat_findnew(key, name, flags);
if (!ls)
return -ENOMEM;
......@@ -1460,10 +1480,19 @@ static void print_contention_result(struct lock_contention *con)
list_for_each_entry(key, &lock_keys, list)
pr_info("%*s ", key->len, key->header);
if (show_thread_stats)
switch (aggr_mode) {
case LOCK_AGGR_TASK:
pr_info(" %10s %s\n\n", "pid", "comm");
else
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_CALLER:
pr_info(" %10s %s\n\n", "type", "caller");
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_ADDR:
pr_info(" %16s %s\n\n", "address", "symbol");
break;
default:
break;
}
}
bad = total = printed = 0;
......@@ -1471,6 +1500,9 @@ static void print_contention_result(struct lock_contention *con)
bad = bad_hist[BROKEN_CONTENDED];
while ((st = pop_from_result())) {
struct thread *t;
int pid;
total += use_bpf ? st->nr_contended : 1;
if (st->broken)
bad++;
......@@ -1480,18 +1512,24 @@ static void print_contention_result(struct lock_contention *con)
pr_info(" ");
}
if (show_thread_stats) {
struct thread *t;
int pid = st->addr;
/* st->addr contains tid of thread */
switch (aggr_mode) {
case LOCK_AGGR_CALLER:
pr_info(" %10s %s\n", get_type_str(st), st->name);
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_TASK:
pid = st->addr;
t = perf_session__findnew(session, pid);
pr_info(" %10d %s\n", pid, thread__comm_str(t));
goto next;
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_ADDR:
pr_info(" %016llx %s\n", (unsigned long long)st->addr,
st->name ? : "");
break;
default:
break;
}
pr_info(" %10s %s\n", get_type_str(st), st->name);
if (verbose) {
if (aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_CALLER && verbose) {
struct map *kmap;
struct symbol *sym;
char buf[128];
......@@ -1508,7 +1546,6 @@ static void print_contention_result(struct lock_contention *con)
}
}
next:
if (++printed >= print_nr_entries)
break;
}
......@@ -1616,7 +1653,6 @@ static int __cmd_contention(int argc, const char **argv)
.map_nr_entries = bpf_map_entries,
.max_stack = max_stack_depth,
.stack_skip = stack_skip,
.aggr_mode = show_thread_stats ? LOCK_AGGR_TASK : LOCK_AGGR_CALLER,
};
session = perf_session__new(use_bpf ? NULL : &data, &eops);
......@@ -1627,6 +1663,9 @@ static int __cmd_contention(int argc, const char **argv)
con.machine = &session->machines.host;
con.aggr_mode = aggr_mode = show_thread_stats ? LOCK_AGGR_TASK :
show_lock_addrs ? LOCK_AGGR_ADDR : LOCK_AGGR_CALLER;
/* for lock function check */
symbol_conf.sort_by_name = true;
symbol__init(&session->header.env);
......@@ -1907,6 +1946,7 @@ int cmd_lock(int argc, const char **argv)
"Set the number of stack depth to skip when finding a lock caller, "
"Default: " __stringify(CONTENTION_STACK_SKIP)),
OPT_INTEGER('E', "entries", &print_nr_entries, "display this many functions"),
OPT_BOOLEAN('l', "lock-addr", &show_lock_addrs, "show lock stats by address"),
OPT_PARENT(lock_options)
};
......@@ -1976,6 +2016,16 @@ int cmd_lock(int argc, const char **argv)
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, contention_options,
contention_usage, 0);
}
if (show_thread_stats && show_lock_addrs) {
pr_err("Cannot use thread and addr mode together\n");
parse_options_usage(contention_usage, contention_options,
"threads", 0);
parse_options_usage(NULL, contention_options,
"lock-addr", 0);
return -1;
}
rc = __cmd_contention(argc, argv);
} else {
usage_with_options(lock_usage, lock_options);
......
......@@ -137,11 +137,15 @@ int lock_contention_read(struct lock_contention *con)
thread__set_comm(idle, "swapper", /*timestamp=*/0);
}
/* make sure it loads the kernel map */
map__load(maps__first(machine->kmaps));
prev_key = NULL;
while (!bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, prev_key, &key)) {
struct map *kmap;
struct symbol *sym;
int idx = 0;
s32 stack_id;
/* to handle errors in the loop body */
err = -1;
......@@ -160,24 +164,31 @@ int lock_contention_read(struct lock_contention *con)
st->avg_wait_time = data.total_time / data.count;
st->flags = data.flags;
st->addr = key.aggr_key;
if (con->aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_TASK) {
struct contention_task_data task;
struct thread *t;
st->addr = key.stack_or_task_id;
int pid = key.aggr_key;
/* do not update idle comm which contains CPU number */
if (st->addr) {
bpf_map_lookup_elem(task_fd, &key, &task);
t = __machine__findnew_thread(machine, /*pid=*/-1,
key.stack_or_task_id);
bpf_map_lookup_elem(task_fd, &pid, &task);
t = __machine__findnew_thread(machine, /*pid=*/-1, pid);
thread__set_comm(t, task.comm, /*timestamp=*/0);
}
goto next;
}
bpf_map_lookup_elem(stack, &key, stack_trace);
if (con->aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_ADDR) {
sym = machine__find_kernel_symbol(machine, st->addr, &kmap);
if (sym)
st->name = strdup(sym->name);
goto next;
}
stack_id = key.aggr_key;
bpf_map_lookup_elem(stack, &stack_id, stack_trace);
/* skip lock internal functions */
while (machine__is_lock_function(machine, stack_trace[idx]) &&
......
......@@ -168,11 +168,20 @@ int contention_end(u64 *ctx)
duration = bpf_ktime_get_ns() - pelem->timestamp;
if (aggr_mode == LOCK_AGGR_CALLER) {
key.stack_or_task_id = pelem->stack_id;
} else {
key.stack_or_task_id = pid;
switch (aggr_mode) {
case LOCK_AGGR_CALLER:
key.aggr_key = pelem->stack_id;
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_TASK:
key.aggr_key = pid;
update_task_data(pid);
break;
case LOCK_AGGR_ADDR:
key.aggr_key = pelem->lock;
break;
default:
/* should not happen */
return 0;
}
data = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&lock_stat, &key);
......
......@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
#define UTIL_BPF_SKEL_LOCK_DATA_H
struct contention_key {
s32 stack_or_task_id;
u64 aggr_key; /* can be stack_id, pid or lock addr */
};
#define TASK_COMM_LEN 16
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment