Commit 69b3d872 authored by Imre Deak's avatar Imre Deak Committed by Joonas Lahtinen

drm/i915/dp_mst: Handle error during DSC BW overhead/slice calculation

The MST branch device may not support the number of DSC slices a mode
requires, handle the error in this case.

Fixes: 4e0837a8 ("drm/i915/dp_mst: Account for FEC and DSC overhead during BW allocation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.8+
Reviewed-by: default avatarSuraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241009110135.1216498-1-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 802a69b6b8a0502a9e2309afec7e1b77f67874f2)
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
parent 8e929cb5
......@@ -89,25 +89,19 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_max_dpt_bpp(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
static int intel_dp_mst_bw_overhead(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
const struct intel_connector *connector,
bool ssc, bool dsc, int bpp_x16)
bool ssc, int dsc_slice_count, int bpp_x16)
{
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
unsigned long flags = DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_MST;
int dsc_slice_count = 0;
int overhead;
flags |= intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) ? DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_UHBR : 0;
flags |= ssc ? DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_SSC_REF_CLK : 0;
flags |= crtc_state->fec_enable ? DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC : 0;
if (dsc) {
if (dsc_slice_count)
flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_DSC;
dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
adjusted_mode->clock,
adjusted_mode->hdisplay,
crtc_state->joiner_pipes);
}
overhead = drm_dp_bw_overhead(crtc_state->lane_count,
adjusted_mode->hdisplay,
......@@ -153,6 +147,19 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_calc_pbn(int pixel_clock, int bpp_x16, int bw_overhead)
return DIV_ROUND_UP(effective_data_rate * 64, 54 * 1000);
}
static int intel_dp_mst_dsc_get_slice_count(const struct intel_connector *connector,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
int num_joined_pipes = crtc_state->joiner_pipes;
return intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
adjusted_mode->clock,
adjusted_mode->hdisplay,
num_joined_pipes);
}
static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
int max_bpp,
......@@ -172,6 +179,7 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
int dsc_slice_count = 0;
int max_dpt_bpp;
int ret = 0;
......@@ -203,6 +211,15 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Looking for slots in range min bpp %d max bpp %d\n",
min_bpp, max_bpp);
if (dsc) {
dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_mst_dsc_get_slice_count(connector, crtc_state);
if (!dsc_slice_count) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Can't get valid DSC slice count\n");
return -ENOSPC;
}
}
for (bpp = max_bpp; bpp >= min_bpp; bpp -= step) {
int local_bw_overhead;
int remote_bw_overhead;
......@@ -216,9 +233,9 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
intel_dp_output_bpp(crtc_state->output_format, bpp));
local_bw_overhead = intel_dp_mst_bw_overhead(crtc_state, connector,
false, dsc, link_bpp_x16);
false, dsc_slice_count, link_bpp_x16);
remote_bw_overhead = intel_dp_mst_bw_overhead(crtc_state, connector,
true, dsc, link_bpp_x16);
true, dsc_slice_count, link_bpp_x16);
intel_dp_mst_compute_m_n(crtc_state, connector,
local_bw_overhead,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment