Commit 6aec5000 authored by Mathias Nyman's avatar Mathias Nyman Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

xhci: dbc: Don't call dbc_tty_init() on every dbc tty probe

The current workaround to call the dbc_tty_init() in probe is
not working in case we have several xhci devices with dbc enabled.

dbc_tty_init() should be called only once by a module init call when
module is loaded.

until dbgtty is its own module call dbc_tty_init() from xhci
module init call.

Same is true for unloading and dbc_tty_exit()
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220216095153.1303105-5-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 5c44d9d7
......@@ -1087,3 +1087,13 @@ int xhci_dbc_resume(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
return ret;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
int xhci_dbc_init(void)
{
return dbc_tty_init();
}
void xhci_dbc_exit(void)
{
dbc_tty_exit();
}
......@@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ static inline struct dbc_ep *get_out_ep(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
#ifdef CONFIG_USB_XHCI_DBGCAP
int xhci_create_dbc_dev(struct xhci_hcd *xhci);
void xhci_remove_dbc_dev(struct xhci_hcd *xhci);
int xhci_dbc_init(void);
void xhci_dbc_exit(void);
int dbc_tty_init(void);
void dbc_tty_exit(void);
int xhci_dbc_tty_probe(struct device *dev, void __iomem *res, struct xhci_hcd *xhci);
void xhci_dbc_tty_remove(struct xhci_dbc *dbc);
struct xhci_dbc *xhci_alloc_dbc(struct device *dev, void __iomem *res,
......@@ -219,7 +223,13 @@ static inline int xhci_create_dbc_dev(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
static inline void xhci_remove_dbc_dev(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
}
static inline int xhci_dbc_init(void)
{
return 0;
}
static inline void xhci_dbc_exit(void)
{
}
static inline int xhci_dbc_suspend(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
return 0;
......
......@@ -14,9 +14,6 @@
#include "xhci.h"
#include "xhci-dbgcap.h"
static int dbc_tty_init(void);
static void dbc_tty_exit(void);
static struct tty_driver *dbc_tty_driver;
static inline struct dbc_port *dbc_to_port(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
......@@ -474,16 +471,12 @@ int xhci_dbc_tty_probe(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct xhci_hcd *
struct dbc_port *port;
int status;
/* dbc_tty_init will be called by module init() in the future */
status = dbc_tty_init();
if (status)
return status;
if (!dbc_tty_driver)
return -ENODEV;
port = kzalloc(sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!port) {
status = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
if (!port)
return -ENOMEM;
dbc_tty_driver->driver_state = port;
......@@ -501,9 +494,7 @@ int xhci_dbc_tty_probe(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base, struct xhci_hcd *
return 0;
out2:
kfree(port);
out:
/* dbc_tty_exit will be called by module_exit() in the future */
dbc_tty_exit();
return status;
}
......@@ -517,12 +508,9 @@ void xhci_dbc_tty_remove(struct xhci_dbc *dbc)
xhci_dbc_remove(dbc);
kfree(port);
/* dbc_tty_exit will be called by module_exit() in the future */
dbc_tty_exit();
}
static int dbc_tty_init(void)
int dbc_tty_init(void)
{
int ret;
......@@ -552,7 +540,7 @@ static int dbc_tty_init(void)
return ret;
}
static void dbc_tty_exit(void)
void dbc_tty_exit(void)
{
if (dbc_tty_driver) {
tty_unregister_driver(dbc_tty_driver);
......
......@@ -5495,6 +5495,7 @@ static int __init xhci_hcd_init(void)
return -ENODEV;
xhci_debugfs_create_root();
xhci_dbc_init();
return 0;
}
......@@ -5506,6 +5507,7 @@ static int __init xhci_hcd_init(void)
static void __exit xhci_hcd_fini(void)
{
xhci_debugfs_remove_root();
xhci_dbc_exit();
}
module_init(xhci_hcd_init);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment