Commit 6b1859db authored by John Stultz's avatar John Stultz Committed by Thomas Gleixner

ntp: Fix STA_INS/DEL clearing bug

In commit 6b43ae8a, I
introduced a bug that kept the STA_INS or STA_DEL bit
from being cleared from time_status via adjtimex()
without forcing STA_PLL first.

Usually once the STA_INS is set, it isn't cleared
until the leap second is applied, so its unlikely this
affected anyone. However during testing I noticed it
took some effort to cancel a leap second once STA_INS
was set.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.4
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1342156917-25092-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent 84a1caf1
...@@ -409,7 +409,9 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs) ...@@ -409,7 +409,9 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
time_state = TIME_DEL; time_state = TIME_DEL;
break; break;
case TIME_INS: case TIME_INS:
if (secs % 86400 == 0) { if (!(time_status & STA_INS))
time_state = TIME_OK;
else if (secs % 86400 == 0) {
leap = -1; leap = -1;
time_state = TIME_OOP; time_state = TIME_OOP;
time_tai++; time_tai++;
...@@ -418,7 +420,9 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs) ...@@ -418,7 +420,9 @@ int second_overflow(unsigned long secs)
} }
break; break;
case TIME_DEL: case TIME_DEL:
if ((secs + 1) % 86400 == 0) { if (!(time_status & STA_DEL))
time_state = TIME_OK;
else if ((secs + 1) % 86400 == 0) {
leap = 1; leap = 1;
time_tai--; time_tai--;
time_state = TIME_WAIT; time_state = TIME_WAIT;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment