selftests: vDSO: fix the way vDSO functions are called for powerpc
vdso_test_correctness test fails on powerpc: ~ # ./vdso_test_correctness ... [RUN] Testing clock_gettime for clock CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM (8)... [FAIL] No such clock, but __vdso_clock_gettime returned 22 [RUN] Testing clock_gettime for clock CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM (9)... [FAIL] No such clock, but __vdso_clock_gettime returned 22 [RUN] Testing clock_gettime for clock CLOCK_SGI_CYCLE (10)... [FAIL] No such clock, but __vdso_clock_gettime returned 22 ... [RUN] Testing clock_gettime for clock invalid (-1)... [FAIL] No such clock, but __vdso_clock_gettime returned 22 [RUN] Testing clock_gettime for clock invalid (-2147483648)... [FAIL] No such clock, but __vdso_clock_gettime returned 22 [RUN] Testing clock_gettime for clock invalid (2147483647)... [FAIL] No such clock, but __vdso_clock_gettime returned 22 On powerpc, a call to a VDSO function is not an ordinary C function call. Unlike several architectures which returns a negative error code in case of an error, powerpc sets CR[SO] and returns the error code as a positive value. Define and use a macro called VDSO_CALL() which takes a pointer to the function to call, the number of arguments and the arguments. Also update ABI vdso documentation to reflect this subtlety. Provide a specific version of VDSO_CALL() for powerpc that negates the error code on return when CR[SO] is set. Fixes: c7e5789b ("kselftest: Move test_vdso to the vDSO test suite") Fixes: 2e9a9725 ("selftests: vdso: Add a selftest for vDSO getcpu()") Fixes: 693f5ca0 ("kselftest: Extend vDSO selftest") Fixes: b2f1c3db ("kselftest: Extend vdso correctness test to clock_gettime64") Fixes: 4920a259 ("selftests/vDSO: add tests for vgetrandom") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment