Commit 6f25f398 authored by David S. Miller's avatar David S. Miller Committed by David S. Miller

[SPARC64]: Make tsb_sync() mm comparison more precise.

switch_mm() changes the mm state and does a tsb_context_switch()
first, then we do the cpu register state switch which changes
current_thread_info() and current().

So it's safer to check the PGD physical address stored in the
trap block (which will be updated by the tsb_context_switch() in
switch_mm()) than current->active_mm.

Technically we should never run here in between those two
updates, because interrupts are disabled during the entire
context switch operation.  But some day we might like to leave
interrupts enabled during the context switch and this change
allows that to happen without any surprises.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 683aa401
...@@ -830,9 +830,16 @@ void smp_call_function_client(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs) ...@@ -830,9 +830,16 @@ void smp_call_function_client(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
static void tsb_sync(void *info) static void tsb_sync(void *info)
{ {
struct trap_per_cpu *tp = &trap_block[raw_smp_processor_id()];
struct mm_struct *mm = info; struct mm_struct *mm = info;
if (current->active_mm == mm) /* It is not valid to test "currrent->active_mm == mm" here.
*
* The value of "current" is not changed atomically with
* switch_mm(). But that's OK, we just need to check the
* current cpu's trap block PGD physical address.
*/
if (tp->pgd_paddr == __pa(mm->pgd))
tsb_context_switch(mm); tsb_context_switch(mm);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment