xfs: handle dquot buffer readahead in log recovery correctly
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590455 commit 7d6a13f0 upstream. When we do dquot readahead in log recovery, we do not use a verifier as the underlying buffer may not have dquots in it. e.g. the allocation operation hasn't yet been replayed. Hence we do not want to fail recovery because we detect an operation to be replayed has not been run yet. This problem was addressed for inodes in commit d8914002 ("xfs: inode buffers may not be valid during recovery readahead") but the problem was not recognised to exist for dquots and their buffers as the dquot readahead did not have a verifier. The result of not using a verifier is that when the buffer is then next read to replay a dquot modification, the dquot buffer verifier will only be attached to the buffer if *readahead is not complete*. Hence we can read the buffer, replay the dquot changes and then add it to the delwri submission list without it having a verifier attached to it. This then generates warnings in xfs_buf_ioapply(), which catches and warns about this case. Fix this and make it handle the same readahead verifier error cases as for inode buffers by adding a new readahead verifier that has a write operation as well as a read operation that marks the buffer as not done if any corruption is detected. Also make sure we don't run readahead if the dquot buffer has been marked as cancelled by recovery. This will result in readahead either succeeding and the buffer having a valid write verifier, or readahead failing and the buffer state requiring the subsequent read to resubmit the IO with the new verifier. In either case, this will result in the buffer always ending up with a valid write verifier on it. Note: we also need to fix the inode buffer readahead error handling to mark the buffer with EIO. Brian noticed the code I copied from there wrong during review, so fix it at the same time. Add comments linking the two functions that handle readahead verifier errors together so we don't forget this behavioural link in future. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment