Commit 72f40a28 authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner

x86/softirq/64: Inline do_softirq_own_stack()

There is no reason to have this as a seperate function for a single caller.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210210002513.382806685@linutronix.de
parent db1cc7ae
......@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
* interrupts are pending to be processed. The interrupt stack cannot be in
* use here.
*/
#define run_softirq_on_irqstack() \
#define do_softirq_own_stack() \
{ \
__this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, true); \
call_on_irqstack(__do_softirq, ASM_CALL_SOFTIRQ); \
......@@ -202,7 +202,6 @@
}
#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
/* System vector handlers always run on the stack they interrupted. */
#define run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond(func, regs) \
{ \
......
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#ifndef _ASM_X86_SOFTIRQ_STACK_H
#define _ASM_X86_SOFTIRQ_STACK_H
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
# include <asm/irq_stack.h>
#else
# include <asm-generic/softirq_stack.h>
#endif
#endif
......@@ -74,8 +74,3 @@ int irq_init_percpu_irqstack(unsigned int cpu)
return 0;
return map_irq_stack(cpu);
}
void do_softirq_own_stack(void)
{
run_softirq_on_irqstack();
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment