Commit 74dd7c97 authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro

ecryptfs_rename(): verify that lower dentries are still OK after lock_rename()

We get lower layer dentries, find their parents, do lock_rename() and
proceed to vfs_rename().  However, we do not check that dentries still
have the same parents and are not unlinked.  Need to check that...
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent b07581d2
......@@ -593,11 +593,16 @@ ecryptfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
lower_new_dir_dentry = dget_parent(lower_new_dentry);
target_inode = d_inode(new_dentry);
trap = lock_rename(lower_old_dir_dentry, lower_new_dir_dentry);
rc = -EINVAL;
if (lower_old_dentry->d_parent != lower_old_dir_dentry)
goto out_lock;
if (lower_new_dentry->d_parent != lower_new_dir_dentry)
goto out_lock;
if (d_unhashed(lower_old_dentry) || d_unhashed(lower_new_dentry))
goto out_lock;
/* source should not be ancestor of target */
if (trap == lower_old_dentry) {
rc = -EINVAL;
if (trap == lower_old_dentry)
goto out_lock;
}
/* target should not be ancestor of source */
if (trap == lower_new_dentry) {
rc = -ENOTEMPTY;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment