Commit 756caf5d authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

usb: ehci-st: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart from
emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve
here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first
step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already
returns void. Eventually after all drivers are converted, .remove_new() is
renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPatrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230517230239.187727-59-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent b87578fa
......@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int st_ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
return err;
}
static int st_ehci_platform_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
static void st_ehci_platform_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
{
struct usb_hcd *hcd = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
struct usb_ehci_pdata *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev);
......@@ -271,8 +271,6 @@ static int st_ehci_platform_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
if (pdata == &ehci_platform_defaults)
dev->dev.platform_data = NULL;
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
......@@ -328,7 +326,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_ehci_ids);
static struct platform_driver ehci_platform_driver = {
.probe = st_ehci_platform_probe,
.remove = st_ehci_platform_remove,
.remove_new = st_ehci_platform_remove,
.shutdown = usb_hcd_platform_shutdown,
.driver = {
.name = "st-ehci",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment