Commit 7679e140 authored by Andy Shevchenko's avatar Andy Shevchenko Committed by Andrew Morton

mm: list_lru: Update kernel documentation to follow the requirements

kernel-doc is not happy about documentation in list_lru.h:

list_lru.h:90: warning: Function parameter or member 'lru' not described in 'list_lru_add'
list_lru.h:90: warning: Excess function parameter 'list_lru' description in 'list_lru_add'
list_lru.h:90: warning: No description found for return value of 'list_lru_add'
list_lru.h:103: warning: Function parameter or member 'lru' not described in 'list_lru_del'
list_lru.h:103: warning: Excess function parameter 'list_lru' description in 'list_lru_del'
list_lru.h:103: warning: No description found for return value of 'list_lru_del'
list_lru.h:116: warning: No description found for return value of 'list_lru_count_one'
list_lru.h:168: warning: No description found for return value of 'list_lru_walk_one'
list_lru.h:185: warning: No description found for return value of 'list_lru_walk_one_irq'

Fix the documentation accordingly.

While at it, fix the references to the parameters in functions
inside the long descriptions, on which the above script is not
complaining (yet?).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231123172320.2434780-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
parent e9119fb6
......@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *paren
/**
* list_lru_add: add an element to the lru list's tail
* @list_lru: the lru pointer
* @lru: the lru pointer
* @item: the item to be added.
*
* If the element is already part of a list, this function returns doing
......@@ -83,22 +83,22 @@ void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *paren
* the caller organize itself in a way that elements can be in more than
* one type of list, it is up to the caller to fully remove the item from
* the previous list (with list_lru_del() for instance) before moving it
* to @list_lru
* to @lru.
*
* Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
* Return: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
*/
bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
/**
* list_lru_del: delete an element to the lru list
* @list_lru: the lru pointer
* @lru: the lru pointer
* @item: the item to be deleted.
*
* This function works analogously as list_lru_add in terms of list
* This function works analogously as list_lru_add() in terms of list
* manipulation. The comments about an element already pertaining to
* a list are also valid for list_lru_del.
* a list are also valid for list_lru_del().
*
* Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
* Return: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
*/
bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
......@@ -108,9 +108,11 @@ bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item);
* @nid: the node id to count from.
* @memcg: the cgroup to count from.
*
* Always return a non-negative number, 0 for empty lists. There is no
* guarantee that the list is not updated while the count is being computed.
* Callers that want such a guarantee need to provide an outer lock.
* There is no guarantee that the list is not updated while the count is being
* computed. Callers that want such a guarantee need to provide an outer lock.
*
* Return: 0 for empty lists, otherwise the number of objects
* currently held by @lru.
*/
unsigned long list_lru_count_one(struct list_lru *lru,
int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
......@@ -141,7 +143,7 @@ typedef enum lru_status (*list_lru_walk_cb)(struct list_head *item,
struct list_lru_one *list, spinlock_t *lock, void *cb_arg);
/**
* list_lru_walk_one: walk a list_lru, isolating and disposing freeable items.
* list_lru_walk_one: walk a @lru, isolating and disposing freeable items.
* @lru: the lru pointer.
* @nid: the node id to scan from.
* @memcg: the cgroup to scan from.
......@@ -150,24 +152,24 @@ typedef enum lru_status (*list_lru_walk_cb)(struct list_head *item,
* @cb_arg: opaque type that will be passed to @isolate
* @nr_to_walk: how many items to scan.
*
* This function will scan all elements in a particular list_lru, calling the
* This function will scan all elements in a particular @lru, calling the
* @isolate callback for each of those items, along with the current list
* spinlock and a caller-provided opaque. The @isolate callback can choose to
* drop the lock internally, but *must* return with the lock held. The callback
* will return an enum lru_status telling the list_lru infrastructure what to
* will return an enum lru_status telling the @lru infrastructure what to
* do with the object being scanned.
*
* Please note that nr_to_walk does not mean how many objects will be freed,
* Please note that @nr_to_walk does not mean how many objects will be freed,
* just how many objects will be scanned.
*
* Return value: the number of objects effectively removed from the LRU.
* Return: the number of objects effectively removed from the LRU.
*/
unsigned long list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru,
int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk);
/**
* list_lru_walk_one_irq: walk a list_lru, isolating and disposing freeable items.
* list_lru_walk_one_irq: walk a @lru, isolating and disposing freeable items.
* @lru: the lru pointer.
* @nid: the node id to scan from.
* @memcg: the cgroup to scan from.
......@@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ unsigned long list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru,
* @cb_arg: opaque type that will be passed to @isolate
* @nr_to_walk: how many items to scan.
*
* Same as @list_lru_walk_one except that the spinlock is acquired with
* Same as list_lru_walk_one() except that the spinlock is acquired with
* spin_lock_irq().
*/
unsigned long list_lru_walk_one_irq(struct list_lru *lru,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment