Commit 76962caa authored by Thomas Gleixner's avatar Thomas Gleixner Committed by Ingo Molnar

intel_idle: Use explicit broadcast control function

Replace the clockevents_notify() call with an explicit function call.
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3878165.rXNXrtVNuy@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent ee7a1438
......@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
#include <linux/clockchips.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <trace/events/power.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
......@@ -665,13 +665,12 @@ static void intel_idle_freeze(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
static void __setup_broadcast_timer(void *arg)
{
unsigned long reason = (unsigned long)arg;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
reason = reason ?
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ON : CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_OFF;
unsigned long on = (unsigned long)arg;
clockevents_notify(reason, &cpu);
if (on)
tick_broadcast_enable();
else
tick_broadcast_disable();
}
static int cpu_hotplug_notify(struct notifier_block *n,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment