Commit 7a98948f authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä Committed by Jani Nikula

drm/i915: Wait for vblank before enabling the TV encoder

The vblank waits in intel_tv_detect_type() are timing out for some
reason. This is a regression caused removing seemingly useless vblank
waits from the modeset seqeuence in:

 commit 56ef52ca
 Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
 Date:   Thu May 8 19:23:15 2014 +0300

    drm/i915: Kill vblank waits after pipe enable on gmch platforms

So it turns out they weren't all entirely useless. Apparently the pipe
has to go through one full frame before we enable the TV port. Add a
vblank wait to intel_enable_tv() to make sure that happens.

Another approach was attempted by placing the vblank wait just after
enabling the port. The theory behind that attempt was that we need to
let the port stay enabled for one full frame before disabling it again
during load detection. But that didn't work, and we definitely must
have the vblank wait before enabling the port.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Bartlett <ajb@elrepo.org>
Tested-by: default avatarAlan Bartlett <ajb@elrepo.org>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79311Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
parent c4d69da1
...@@ -854,6 +854,10 @@ intel_enable_tv(struct intel_encoder *encoder) ...@@ -854,6 +854,10 @@ intel_enable_tv(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev; struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
/* Prevents vblank waits from timing out in intel_tv_detect_type() */
intel_wait_for_vblank(encoder->base.dev,
to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc)->pipe);
I915_WRITE(TV_CTL, I915_READ(TV_CTL) | TV_ENC_ENABLE); I915_WRITE(TV_CTL, I915_READ(TV_CTL) | TV_ENC_ENABLE);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment