Commit 7adafe54 authored by Janakarajan Natarajan's avatar Janakarajan Natarajan Committed by Shuah Khan

cpupower: mperf_monitor: Introduce per_cpu_schedule flag

The per_cpu_schedule flag is used to move the cpupower process to the cpu
on which we are looking to read the APERF/MPERF registers.

This prevents IPIs from being generated by read_msr()s as we are already
on the cpu of interest.

Ex: If cpupower is running on CPU 0 and we execute

    read_msr(20, MSR_APERF, val) then,
    read_msr(20, MSR_MPERF, val)

    the msr module will generate an IPI from CPU 0 to CPU 20 to query
    for the MSR_APERF and then the MSR_MPERF in separate IPIs.

This delay, caused by IPI latency, between reading the APERF and MPERF
registers may cause both of them to go out of sync.

The use of the per_cpu_schedule flag reduces the probability of this
from happening. It comes at the cost of a negligible increase in cpu
consumption caused by the migration of cpupower across each of the
cpus of the system.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJanakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com>
Acked-by: default avatarThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
parent d3f5d2a1
......@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct cpuidle_monitor {
unsigned int overflow_s;
struct {
unsigned int needs_root:1;
unsigned int per_cpu_schedule:1;
} flags;
};
......
......@@ -86,15 +86,35 @@ static int mperf_get_tsc(unsigned long long *tsc)
return ret;
}
static int get_aperf_mperf(int cpu, unsigned long long *aval,
unsigned long long *mval)
{
int ret;
/*
* Running on the cpu from which we read the registers will
* prevent APERF/MPERF from going out of sync because of IPI
* latency introduced by read_msr()s.
*/
if (mperf_monitor.flags.per_cpu_schedule) {
if (bind_cpu(cpu))
return 1;
}
ret = read_msr(cpu, MSR_APERF, aval);
ret |= read_msr(cpu, MSR_MPERF, mval);
return ret;
}
static int mperf_init_stats(unsigned int cpu)
{
unsigned long long val;
unsigned long long aval, mval;
int ret;
ret = read_msr(cpu, MSR_APERF, &val);
aperf_previous_count[cpu] = val;
ret |= read_msr(cpu, MSR_MPERF, &val);
mperf_previous_count[cpu] = val;
ret = get_aperf_mperf(cpu, &aval, &mval);
aperf_previous_count[cpu] = aval;
mperf_previous_count[cpu] = mval;
is_valid[cpu] = !ret;
return 0;
......@@ -102,13 +122,12 @@ static int mperf_init_stats(unsigned int cpu)
static int mperf_measure_stats(unsigned int cpu)
{
unsigned long long val;
unsigned long long aval, mval;
int ret;
ret = read_msr(cpu, MSR_APERF, &val);
aperf_current_count[cpu] = val;
ret |= read_msr(cpu, MSR_MPERF, &val);
mperf_current_count[cpu] = val;
ret = get_aperf_mperf(cpu, &aval, &mval);
aperf_current_count[cpu] = aval;
mperf_current_count[cpu] = mval;
is_valid[cpu] = !ret;
return 0;
......@@ -305,6 +324,9 @@ struct cpuidle_monitor *mperf_register(void)
if (init_maxfreq_mode())
return NULL;
if (cpupower_cpu_info.vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
mperf_monitor.flags.per_cpu_schedule = 1;
/* Free this at program termination */
is_valid = calloc(cpu_count, sizeof(int));
mperf_previous_count = calloc(cpu_count, sizeof(unsigned long long));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment