openvswitch: meter: remove rate from the bucket size calculation
Implementation of meters supposed to be a classic token bucket with 2 typical parameters: rate and burst size. Burst size in this schema is the maximum number of bytes/packets that could pass without being rate limited. Recent changes to userspace datapath made meter implementation to be in line with the kernel one, and this uncovered several issues. The main problem is that maximum bucket size for unknown reason accounts not only burst size, but also the numerical value of rate. This creates a lot of confusion around behavior of meters. For example, if rate is configured as 1000 pps and burst size set to 1, this should mean that meter will tolerate bursts of 1 packet at most, i.e. not a single packet above the rate should pass the meter. However, current implementation calculates maximum bucket size as (rate + burst size), so the effective bucket size will be 1001. This means that first 1000 packets will not be rate limited and average rate might be twice as high as the configured rate. This also makes it practically impossible to configure meter that will have burst size lower than the rate, which might be a desirable configuration if the rate is high. Inability to configure low values of a burst size and overall inability for a user to predict what will be a maximum and average rate from the configured parameters of a meter without looking at the OVS and kernel code might be also classified as a security issue, because drop meters are frequently used as a way of protection from DoS attacks. This change removes rate from the calculation of a bucket size, making it in line with the classic token bucket algorithm and essentially making the rate and burst tolerance being predictable from a users' perspective. Same change proposed for the userspace implementation. Fixes: 96fbc13d ("openvswitch: Add meter infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment