Commit 7e186433 authored by Jisheng Zhang's avatar Jisheng Zhang Committed by Palmer Dabbelt

riscv: fix race when vmap stack overflow

Currently, when detecting vmap stack overflow, riscv firstly switches
to the so called shadow stack, then use this shadow stack to call the
get_overflow_stack() to get the overflow stack. However, there's
a race here if two or more harts use the same shadow stack at the same
time.

To solve this race, we introduce spin_shadow_stack atomic var, which
will be swap between its own address and 0 in atomic way, when the
var is set, it means the shadow_stack is being used; when the var
is cleared, it means the shadow_stack isn't being used.

Fixes: 31da94c2 ("riscv: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: default avatarGuo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarGuo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221030124517.2370-1-jszhang@kernel.org
[Palmer: Add AQ to the swap, and also some comments.]
Signed-off-by: default avatarPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
parent 31da94c2
......@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#define REG_L __REG_SEL(ld, lw)
#define REG_S __REG_SEL(sd, sw)
#define REG_SC __REG_SEL(sc.d, sc.w)
#define REG_AMOSWAP_AQ __REG_SEL(amoswap.d.aq, amoswap.w.aq)
#define REG_ASM __REG_SEL(.dword, .word)
#define SZREG __REG_SEL(8, 4)
#define LGREG __REG_SEL(3, 2)
......
......@@ -387,6 +387,19 @@ handle_syscall_trace_exit:
#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
handle_kernel_stack_overflow:
/*
* Takes the psuedo-spinlock for the shadow stack, in case multiple
* harts are concurrently overflowing their kernel stacks. We could
* store any value here, but since we're overflowing the kernel stack
* already we only have SP to use as a scratch register. So we just
* swap in the address of the spinlock, as that's definately non-zero.
*
* Pairs with a store_release in handle_bad_stack().
*/
1: la sp, spin_shadow_stack
REG_AMOSWAP_AQ sp, sp, (sp)
bnez sp, 1b
la sp, shadow_stack
addi sp, sp, SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE
......
......@@ -213,11 +213,29 @@ asmlinkage unsigned long get_overflow_stack(void)
OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE;
}
/*
* A pseudo spinlock to protect the shadow stack from being used by multiple
* harts concurrently. This isn't a real spinlock because the lock side must
* be taken without a valid stack and only a single register, it's only taken
* while in the process of panicing anyway so the performance and error
* checking a proper spinlock gives us doesn't matter.
*/
unsigned long spin_shadow_stack;
asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack;
unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack);
/*
* We're done with the shadow stack by this point, as we're on the
* overflow stack. Tell any other concurrent overflowing harts that
* they can proceed with panicing by releasing the pseudo-spinlock.
*
* This pairs with an amoswap.aq in handle_kernel_stack_overflow.
*/
smp_store_release(&spin_shadow_stack, 0);
console_verbose();
pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!\n");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment