perf arm64: Fix mksyscalltbl, don't lose syscalls due to sort -nu
When using "sort -nu", arm64 syscalls were lost. That is, the io_setup syscall (number 0) and all but one (typically ftruncate; 64) of the syscalls that are defined symbolically (like "#define __NR_ftruncate __NR3264_ftruncate") at the point where "sort" is applied. This creation-of-syscalls.c-scheme is, judging from comments, copy-pasted from powerpc, and worked there because at the time, its tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h had *literals*, like "#define __NR_ftruncate 93". With sort being numeric and the non-numeric key effectively evaluating to 0, the sort option "-u" means these "duplicates" are removed. There's no need to remove syscall lines with duplicate numbers for arm64 because there are none, so let's fix that by just losing the "-u". Having the table numerically sorted on syscall-number for the rest of the syscalls looks nice, so keep the "-n". Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com> Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201228023941.E0DE2203B5@pchp3.se.axis.comSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment