Commit 7f402919 authored by Devarsh Thakkar's avatar Devarsh Thakkar Committed by Mathieu Poirier

remoteproc: k3-r5: Simplify cluster mode setting usage

Check the validity of mode against SoC supported modes right
at the probe to minimize the usage of same check further in the code.

Set default value of cluster-mode only if cluster-mode device tree property
is empty.

In case devicetree provided cluster-mode property is invalid For e.g. using
CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU on any SoC other than am64x then return error.

If firmware has set the PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_SINGLECORE_ONLY flag then
what it means is that only CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU is possible to use [1]
and hence there is no need to check for soc_data->single_cpu_mode first and
then checking cluster mode.

PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE flag can be set directly for
CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU without checking for soc_data->single_cpu_mode since
that check has already been done during probe.

For IPC-only mode, directly override cluster mode as per config flag set by
bootloader without checking for soc specific data. This because config
flag would already have been validated by firmware when bootloader was
setting it.

Link:
[1] https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/2_tisci_msgs/security/PROC_BOOT.html?highlight=singlecore_only#arm-r5Signed-off-by: default avatarDevarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327152832.923480-2-devarsht@ti.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
parent e1996799
......@@ -852,38 +852,33 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
dev_dbg(dev, "boot_vector = 0x%llx, cfg = 0x%x ctrl = 0x%x stat = 0x%x\n",
boot_vec, cfg, ctrl, stat);
/* check if only Single-CPU mode is supported on applicable SoCs */
if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) {
single_cpu =
!!(stat & PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_SINGLECORE_ONLY);
if (single_cpu && cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT) {
dev_err(cluster->dev, "split-mode not permitted, force configuring for single-cpu mode\n");
cluster->mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU;
}
goto config;
single_cpu = !!(stat & PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_SINGLECORE_ONLY);
lockstep_en = !!(stat & PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP_PERMITTED);
/* Override to single CPU mode if set in status flag */
if (single_cpu && cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT) {
dev_err(cluster->dev, "split-mode not permitted, force configuring for single-cpu mode\n");
cluster->mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU;
}
/* check conventional LockStep vs Split mode configuration */
lockstep_en = !!(stat & PROC_BOOT_STATUS_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP_PERMITTED);
/* Override to split mode if lockstep enable bit is not set in status flag */
if (!lockstep_en && cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP) {
dev_err(cluster->dev, "lockstep mode not permitted, force configuring for split-mode\n");
cluster->mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT;
}
config:
/* always enable ARM mode and set boot vector to 0 */
boot_vec = 0x0;
if (core == core0) {
clr_cfg = PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TEINIT;
if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) {
/*
* Single-CPU configuration bit can only be configured
* on Core0 and system firmware will NACK any requests
* with the bit configured, so program it only on
* permitted cores
*/
if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU)
set_cfg = PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE;
/*
* Single-CPU configuration bit can only be configured
* on Core0 and system firmware will NACK any requests
* with the bit configured, so program it only on
* permitted cores
*/
if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) {
set_cfg = PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE;
} else {
/*
* LockStep configuration bit is Read-only on Split-mode
......@@ -1108,12 +1103,12 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster;
struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core;
struct device *cdev = core->dev;
bool r_state = false, c_state = false;
bool r_state = false, c_state = false, lockstep_en = false, single_cpu = false;
u32 ctrl = 0, cfg = 0, stat = 0, halted = 0;
u64 boot_vec = 0;
u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama;
struct k3_r5_core *core0;
enum cluster_mode mode;
enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode;
int ret;
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
......@@ -1147,13 +1142,14 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
atcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_ATCM_EN ? 1 : 0;
btcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_BTCM_EN ? 1 : 0;
loczrama = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TCM_RSTBASE ? 1 : 0;
if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) {
mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE ?
CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT;
} else {
mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP ?
CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT;
}
single_cpu = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE ? 1 : 0;
lockstep_en = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP ? 1 : 0;
if (single_cpu)
mode = CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU;
if (lockstep_en)
mode = CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
halted = ctrl & PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT;
/*
......@@ -1700,12 +1696,6 @@ static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
cluster->dev = dev;
/*
* default to most common efuse configurations - Split-mode on AM64x
* and LockStep-mode on all others
*/
cluster->mode = data->single_cpu_mode ?
CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT : CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
cluster->soc_data = data;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cluster->cores);
......@@ -1716,6 +1706,20 @@ static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
if (ret == -EINVAL) {
/*
* default to most common efuse configurations - Split-mode on AM64x
* and LockStep-mode on all others
*/
cluster->mode = data->single_cpu_mode ?
CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT : CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
}
if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU && !data->single_cpu_mode) {
dev_err(dev, "Cluster mode = %d is not supported on this SoC\n", cluster->mode);
return -EINVAL;
}
num_cores = of_get_available_child_count(np);
if (num_cores != 2) {
dev_err(dev, "MCU cluster requires both R5F cores to be enabled, num_cores = %d\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment