Commit 7f709a48 authored by Trond Myklebust's avatar Trond Myklebust

NFSv4: Fix an oopsable condition in nfs_free_seqid

 Storing a pointer to the struct rpc_task in the nfs_seqid is broken
 since the nfs_seqid may be freed well after the task has been destroyed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
parent cb1f7be7
...@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ struct nfs_seqid_counter { ...@@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ struct nfs_seqid_counter {
struct nfs_seqid { struct nfs_seqid {
struct list_head list; struct list_head list;
struct nfs_seqid_counter *sequence; struct nfs_seqid_counter *sequence;
struct rpc_task *task;
}; };
static inline void nfs_confirm_seqid(struct nfs_seqid_counter *seqid, int status) static inline void nfs_confirm_seqid(struct nfs_seqid_counter *seqid, int status)
......
...@@ -676,7 +676,6 @@ struct nfs_seqid *nfs_alloc_seqid(struct nfs_seqid_counter *counter) ...@@ -676,7 +676,6 @@ struct nfs_seqid *nfs_alloc_seqid(struct nfs_seqid_counter *counter)
new = kmalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL); new = kmalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_KERNEL);
if (new != NULL) { if (new != NULL) {
new->sequence = counter; new->sequence = counter;
new->task = NULL;
spin_lock(&sequence->lock); spin_lock(&sequence->lock);
list_add_tail(&new->list, &sequence->list); list_add_tail(&new->list, &sequence->list);
spin_unlock(&sequence->lock); spin_unlock(&sequence->lock);
...@@ -687,15 +686,10 @@ struct nfs_seqid *nfs_alloc_seqid(struct nfs_seqid_counter *counter) ...@@ -687,15 +686,10 @@ struct nfs_seqid *nfs_alloc_seqid(struct nfs_seqid_counter *counter)
void nfs_free_seqid(struct nfs_seqid *seqid) void nfs_free_seqid(struct nfs_seqid *seqid)
{ {
struct rpc_sequence *sequence = seqid->sequence->sequence; struct rpc_sequence *sequence = seqid->sequence->sequence;
struct rpc_task *next = NULL;
spin_lock(&sequence->lock); spin_lock(&sequence->lock);
list_del(&seqid->list); list_del(&seqid->list);
if (!list_empty(&sequence->list)) { rpc_wake_up(&sequence->wait);
next = list_entry(sequence->list.next, struct nfs_seqid, list)->task;
if (next)
rpc_wake_up_task(next);
}
spin_unlock(&sequence->lock); spin_unlock(&sequence->lock);
kfree(seqid); kfree(seqid);
} }
...@@ -754,7 +748,6 @@ int nfs_wait_on_sequence(struct nfs_seqid *seqid, struct rpc_task *task) ...@@ -754,7 +748,6 @@ int nfs_wait_on_sequence(struct nfs_seqid *seqid, struct rpc_task *task)
spin_lock(&sequence->lock); spin_lock(&sequence->lock);
if (sequence->list.next != &seqid->list) { if (sequence->list.next != &seqid->list) {
seqid->task = task;
rpc_sleep_on(&sequence->wait, task, NULL, NULL); rpc_sleep_on(&sequence->wait, task, NULL, NULL);
status = -EAGAIN; status = -EAGAIN;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment